Subject:
|
Re: Statistics request: NNTP vs HTTP vs SMTP/POP?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 8 Mar 2000 03:56:08 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4362 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Richard Franks writes:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
>
> > 35446 31.01% http://www.lugnet.com/news/post/
> > 59780 52.30% direct NNTP access
> >
> > [...snipped - comparaing all (above) with last 10,000 (below)...]
> >
> > 4567 46.57% direct NNTP access
> > 4744 47.44% http://www.lugnet.com/news/post/ (web interface)
> > ------- ------- --------------------------------------------------
>
> Would it be greedy to ask for the last 20,000 and 30,000 (or whatever • figures),
> to try and determine if there is a definate increase in web-interface usage,
> and whether that increase is peaking, or set to continue further?
>
> I'm not a stats freak - just inanely curious :)
>
> Richard
I think you want blocks of 10000 else you'll have to do the subtraction
yourself. Better yet blocks of 1000, plotted.
Should be a SMOP.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Statistics request: NNTP vs HTTP vs SMTP/POP?
|
| (...) Well, I was trying not to be too greedy :) And in doing so I completely forgot to say thanks for sharing the stats - dunno why exactly I find them interesting, but I do! I'm guessing that the last x is easier to calculate than x to y, but not (...) (27 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Statistics request: NNTP vs HTTP vs SMTP/POP?
|
| (...) Would it be greedy to ask for the last 20,000 and 30,000 (or whatever figures), to try and determine if there is a definate increase in web-interface usage, and whether that increase is peaking, or set to continue further? I'm not a stats (...) (27 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
