 | | Re: Suggested Change in Charter for ALL Lugnet Theme Groups. —Shiri Dori
|
| | | (...) The reference is to auction posts of any kind, whether they are considered spam or not is irrelevant and depends on each individual. (...) I'll quote your original post and reply to that, if you don't mind: "I suggest the pre-auction (...) (24 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Suggested Change in Charter for ALL Lugnet Theme Groups. —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | (...) This was my point. (...) Indeed. But many may consider "box shifters" OK. (...) To allow easy filtering. (...) want (...) out (...) auction (...) (24 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Suggested Change in Charter for ALL Lugnet Theme Groups. —Shiri Dori
|
| | | | | | (...) Like Jeff mentioned - it depends on the individuals, however I didn't hear ONE buyer - not one! - that would be glad to accept these posts in theme-groups. (...) Exactly - even more confusion. 'Why are these types accepted, and others not?' (...) (24 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Suggested Change in Charter for ALL Lugnet Theme Groups. —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | | (...) Indeed. (...) There appears to be some degree of "confusion" right now. Todd's update of the T&C may well change that. (...) It would be clear from the message header what the message contained. (...) (24 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Suggested Change in Charter for ALL Lugnet Theme Groups. —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | | (...) Well, I hear one: Scott. And there may certainly be others out there who are afraid to speak up because they might be labeled the wrong way, or because they know that even though it might benefit them personally, they understand that it would (...) (24 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Standing up for Buyers (WAS: Re: Suggested Change in Charter for ALL Lugnet Theme Groups.) —Mark Rideout
|
| | | | | | (...) Well (although I feel like I'll get stoned by everyone), I'll stand up as a buyer. I would love to see auction announcements in each theme. Being that I perform all my LUGNET browsing through web based, I usually stay to one group. It would be (...) (24 years ago, 8-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Suggested Change in Charter for ALL Lugnet Theme Groups. —James Brown
|
| | | | In lugnet.admin.general, Shiri Dori writes: <sniped bulk of well-said argument against Scott's proposal> (...) Well said, Shiri. This to me, is the crux of the whole thing. Lugnet was (at least partly) created as a response to the fact that RTL (...) (24 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | My Last Word on This(?) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) I’d be mad if I thought this would work. I suppose I really just wanted to see what the range of opinion is. The RTL point raised a few times is hard to argue against as it is very much a “chicken & egg” issue (IMO). If LUGNet does continue to (...) (24 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
