 | | Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images —Eric Joslin
|
| | | (...) Agreed. But I think that one has been resolved, more or less, in that it appears that Todd has indicated that he would like for some sort of commitee to form. (...) Right. (...) Here, we disagree again. I think the T&C are perfectly valid as (...) (24 years ago, 20-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Valid, yes in that they are internally consistent. But broken in that they prevent things that are reasonable and necessary. (...) But I in fact said that cancellation DOES work and IS effective as a control technique. I then pointed out that (...) (24 years ago, 20-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | Larry Pieniazek wrote in message <38B05490.B7C062B8@v...er.net>... (...) stand. I (...) in (...) slip-up) (...) indicate (...) Also at least partly broken in that they rely on Todd's interpretation that a "sealed bid auction" is not an auction (at (...) (24 years ago, 21-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images —Eric Joslin
|
| | | | | | (...) It's an or-best-offer sale. On the internet, sure, there's little difference, but it is a valid sale type. (...) Umm, because it's in no way a sealed bid auction? EBay sends you updates telling you when someone outbids you, shows you a history (...) (24 years ago, 21-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | Lorbaat wrote in message ... (...) that (...) itself (...) difference, (...) auction (...) the (...) Well, if you bid, you generally get zero (if your offer wasn't good enough) or one update notice. Either an outbid notice or a "you won" notice. (...) (24 years ago, 22-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images —James Brown
|
| | | | | | (...) I personally think that SBA's are enough of an auction that they shouldn't be in .BST. However, I've sort-of come around to agreeing with Todd on allowing them there, for a couple of reasons. First being that there really isn't a sufficient (...) (24 years ago, 22-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | | (...) Ok ok ok wait wait stop. I *don't* think that SBA's should be allowed in .buy-sell-trade. What I've always been trying to say is that an SBA is mathematically equivalent to a plain old regular OBO sale. In other words, SBA's that are conducted (...) (24 years ago, 22-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | James Brown wrote in message ... (...) be (...) allowing (...) and (...) mostly (...) the (...) in (...) provide (...) I happen to agree. In fact, if OBO's become relegated to lugnet.market.auction, then the only things which would be acceptable (...) (24 years ago, 22-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images —Eric Joslin
|
| | | | (...) Can you provide an example of something they prevent that is reasonable and necessary? (...) I didn't say you thought that they didn't work in any possible circumstance. I didn't say that *I* thought they didn't work in any possible (...) (24 years ago, 21-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.council)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: When is an auction reference outside market.auction OK? —Eric Joslin
|
| | | | (...) Heh. That irony wasn't lost on me. :D eric (24 years ago, 23-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
