To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 4229
4228  |  4230
Subject: 
Re: Help with slow nntp response
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Wed, 19 Jan 2000 21:27:32 GMT
Viewed: 
235 times
  
I use NNTP all the time and don't see this problem.  It takes about 3
seconds to establish the NNTP connection between my laptop and lugnet.com
and then I can scan and download the 39 groups I'm subscribed to in just a
couple of minutes.

Mike
--
Mike Faunce
mike at faunce dot com
LUGNET #96

"Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message
news:FoLq6t.D95@lugnet.com...
In lugnet.admin.general, Jeremy H. Sproat writes:
Even when I post this message, I have taken too long in its composition.
It'll take a couple of minutes to connect to LUGNET.COM -- but the • actual
transfer after connecting will be quite fast.

Two minutes to make an NNTP connection?  Wow, that's broken.  Should be • 1-3
seconds, tops.  Hmmmm.


Todd indicates that it's not something on the LUGNET.COM end, but rather
some clogged router between you and LUGNET which has no problems with • Web
traffic but takes offense at nntp packets.

Did I say that?!  I don't remember saying that.  I don't understand TCP/IP
deeply enough to make a statement like that.  I wonder if the high message
counts in some groups are starting to slow things down.

--Todd



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Help with slow nntp response
 
(...) Oh yeah. And other folks don't even see the problem. Annoying little devil, ain't it? :-, (...) (URL) I embellished a *little*. And interpreted "net clog" as "clogged router". And forgot to re-iterate the possibility of multiple issues. (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Help with slow nntp response
 
(...) Two minutes to make an NNTP connection? Wow, that's broken. Should be 1-3 seconds, tops. Hmmmm. (...) Did I say that?! I don't remember saying that. I don't understand TCP/IP deeply enough to make a statement like that. I wonder if the high (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

9 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR