| | Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
|
(...) "publishing a link may be copyright violation" That means that either you were the author of the appropriate RFC and retroactively retracted your putting in the Public Domain of the URL scheme, or that "Hey, the LIC in Orlando has some cool (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
| | Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
|
(...) Hmm. Before people go supporting or opposing what Todd will or won't do, shouldn't you wait until you find out what Todd thinks? James (URL) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
| | Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
|
(...) Well, maybe. But Todd's gonna do what he's gonna do. I thought my disagreement with Frank was fairly mild - he would, I wouldn't. Jasper, as usual, is a little more energetic than some, but these are issues that some of us find interesting (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
| | Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
|
(...) Hmmm.. I prefer to get my opinion out _first_, so that it can be considered in that sort of thinking ;) Jasper (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
| | Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
|
(...) Yeah, I'm probably getting all hot and bothered over nothing. *sigh* That's how it goes these days. You go to a club, you think they come onto you, and *bam*, there they take off with a vampire to slay an evil prehistoric monster. Jasper "be (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
| | Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
|
Jasper Janssen wrote in message <3883b8a7.264236860@...et.com>... (...) I don't think it is equivalent to bookburning. In the case of posts which are a clear violation of TLC's copyrights (and I think there are some of those), Todd I think would (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
| | Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
|
(...) Note that I was talking about retroactive cancelling _an account of new rules_. Copyright is hardly a new rule. I'm talking about messages which were legal at the time of posting, but became contra-T&C due to a change in the T&C. (...) Yes. (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|