Subject:
|
Re: COMPLETE LIST OF NEW SETS FOR 2000
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 8 Dec 1999 01:45:37 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
526 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.admin.general, Mike Stanley writes:
> Richard Franks <spontificus@__nospam__yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > *starts pulling at Mikes hair.. Todd.. Todd.. is that you?*
>
> Heh, no. :)
*thinks about pulling some more just to make sure, but decides against it*
> Man, I must not have made myself clear. I don't mean Todd shouldn't
> express himself or his opinions as much as he wants.
> [...]
> Now I'd say something like a sig from his @personal account that
> said something about these being personal messages, not meant as
> indications of policy, yada, yada, yada would go a long way to
> making it OBVIOUS that the person writing the message is personal
> Todd and not Admin Todd.
I should have made myself clear that you had made yourself clear, and that I
agreed with it :)
> Maybe. But it would be a lot easier for one person (Todd) to insert
> a little "Hey, it's me - non-Admin Todd" funny sig in each message
> than it would be for hundreds or thousands of people to read every
> message and check to see which address it came from, don't you
> think? :)
Assuming that he did something like that, then there are *still* going to be
people who misunderstand or feel in awe etc! My point (which complemented,
rather than stepped on the toes of your point), was briefly that we should help
him where we can.. ie remind those who seem confused that Todd is just Todd,
and only LUGNET is the word of god. Or in some other, preferrably less tacky
way :)
Richard
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: COMPLETE LIST OF NEW SETS FOR 2000
|
| (...) Heh, no. :) (...) Man, I must not have made myself clear. I don't mean Todd shouldn't express himself or his opinions as much as he wants. Mainly, what I'm trying to say is that Todd needs to understand that even if HE thinks he's coming (...) (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
9 Messages in This Thread: ![Re: COMPLETE LIST OF NEW SETS FOR 2000 -Mike Stanley (7-Dec-99 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: COMPLETE LIST OF NEW SETS FOR 2000 -Mark Lindsey (7-Dec-99 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: COMPLETE LIST OF NEW SETS FOR 2000 -Mike Stanley (7-Dec-99 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: COMPLETE LIST OF NEW SETS FOR 2000 -Richard Franks (7-Dec-99 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: COMPLETE LIST OF NEW SETS FOR 2000 -Larry Pieniazek (7-Dec-99 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: COMPLETE LIST OF NEW SETS FOR 2000 -Mike Stanley (8-Dec-99 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: COMPLETE LIST OF NEW SETS FOR 2000 -Mike Stanley (8-Dec-99 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: COMPLETE LIST OF NEW SETS FOR 2000 -James Brown (8-Dec-99 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|