Subject:
|
Re: Limiting quotations?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 10 Sep 1999 20:16:08 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
255 times
|
| |
|
|
On Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 10:30:28AM +0000, Jacob Sparre wrote:
> I may not have been clear enough. The server should not
> _edit_ the "bad" posts. They should reject them with a
> message explaining why it was rejected and what they can
> do to get it through the filter anyway.
>
> > I think the repeat offenders should be talked to.
>
> Yes, but sometimes it is easier to make a computer send
> the message _before_ people "misbehave".
Hmmm....I'm not sure what majik would have to done to sendmail to make it
reject...oh...maybe you mean the listserv program! That's easily doable.
That's not a bad idea....can we still add the anti-"nospam" too?
"The reason your mail was rejected was that your return mail address
domain doesn't exist."
Maybe add a config option to their web based subscription page so they can
have LUGNET automagically rewrite their email to something like
joe-AT-lego.gerf.org
No? It doesn't take much to foil a robot, but a human is harder to foil.
*grins*
Ciao!
--
Like the ski resort of girls looking for husbands and husbands looking for girls, the situation is not as symmetrical as it might seem.
The Doctor What: <fill in the blank> http://docwhat.gerf.org/
docwhat@gerf.org (finger docwhat@gerf.org for PGP key)
KF6VNC
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Limiting quotations?
|
| In the following "bad" and "misbehave" is only meant with respect to the suggested policy. Christian Holtje: [...] (...) I may not have been clear enough. The server should not _edit_ the "bad" posts. They should reject them with a message (...) (25 years ago, 10-Sep-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
