Subject:
|
Re: CFD: lugnet.announce
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 10 Oct 1998 09:18:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
648 times
|
| |
|
|
On Sat, 10 Oct 1998 04:12:23 GMT, lehman@javanet.com (Todd Lehman)
wrote:
> lugnet.announce
> ===============
> Should (and can?) lugnet.announce be renamed to something else which isn't such
> a newbie magnet?
No. It's a useful, GOOD group. Make it moderated and you're the only
person that can post stuff to it. IF you want REAL Lego stuff there
too, all people have to do is send it to you. Make the Followup-To
automatically set to lugnet.admin.general
> Would a name such as lugnet.announce.important instead get the point across?
No. .announce is at least standard
> Could a simple re-wording of the charter suffice in place of a renaming?
> (I.e., to say in near-caps that it's not for frivolty?)
I don't think anyone is reading the charters. I surely did not.
Sarah
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: CFD: lugnet.announce
|
| (...) Agreed! It has been my experience that *.announce groups are low-volume, moderated groups with almost no "discussion" going on, and that's why I subscribe to them. -gyug (26 years ago, 12-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | CFD: lugnet.announce
|
| Informal call for dicussion... lugnet.announce ===...=== Should (and can?) lugnet.announce be renamed to something else which isn't such a newbie magnet? Is the current name just too inviting to newbies Would a name such as (...) (26 years ago, 10-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
