Subject:
|
Re: CFD: lugnet.clones
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 10 Oct 1998 09:16:56 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
645 times
|
| |
|
|
On Sat, 10 Oct 1998 04:07:16 GMT, lehman@javanet.com (Todd Lehman)
wrote:
> lugnet.clones
> =============
> Several people have suggested there be a "clones" group, or at least a clearer
> specification of where clones discussions could/should take place. Does a
> lugnet.clones group make sense?
I don't like the name "clone" It does not say intuitively to me Lego
clones. This says, to me, Lugnet clones.
*shrug*
> * If it did exist, would discussions of imitation/off-brands naturally
> gravitate there?
I don't know
> * If it did exist, would fans of clones have a nice and pleasant place to
> discuss clones, or would we see drive-by postings like "Giga-Blocs stink!" ?
Probably we would get quite a bit of this, given the general run of
thing, once we get more people. I don't see many of the people
currently using the server as being this malicious.
> * If it did exist, would it annoy purists that it existed, or would it annoy
> them more than if it didn't exist?
I don't care either way.
Sarah
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | CFD: lugnet.clones
|
| Informal call for dicussion... lugnet.clones ===...=== Several people have suggested there be a "clones" group, or at least a clearer specification of where clones discussions could/should take place. Does a lugnet.clones group make sense? * If it (...) (26 years ago, 10-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
