 | | Re: Traffic Page Problem with Netscape Communicator 4.6
|
|
(...) 4.6. (...) the (...) Thanks Todd, After closing some things down and freeing up some resources it seems to fix the problem. Wierd! I love how no matter how much we try and standardize nothing ever seems to work conistantly across competing (...) (25 years ago, 10-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Traffic Page Problem with Netscape Communicator 4.6
|
|
On Tue, 10 Aug 1999 19:45:19 GMT, "Eric Kingsley" <kingsley@nelug.nospam.org> wrote: (Thanks (...) I'm not seeing how Bill is to blame for a bug in Netscape? Steve (25 years ago, 11-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Traffic Page Problem with Netscape Communicator 4.6
|
|
(...) Wow, talk about gratuitous MS bashing. So it WORKS in Internet Explorer but it's BROKE in Communicator. Seems to me there are 3 groups of people you could choose to blame for something like this in general, with probably only 2 of them being (...) (25 years ago, 11-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Traffic Page Problem with Netscape Communicator 4.6
|
|
(...) Everything is Bill's fault. Examples: I got the Blue Screen of Death! Thanks, Bill! LDraw Crashed! Thanks, Bill! A rocket carrying a $4 billion satelite blew up! Thanks, Bill! See how it works? :) Jeff P.S. Follow-ups sent to .off-topic.fun (...) (25 years ago, 11-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Traffic Page Problem with Netscape Communicator 4.6
|
|
(...) I am glad to see this ploy worked I am just trying to get a rise out of some people. ;P . (...) Don't forget "My Mac blew up" - Thanks, Bill! Bill is just the scurge of all that is PC/NT related. In my oppinion the guy never had an origional (...) (25 years ago, 11-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Traffic Page Problem with Netscape Communicator 4.6
|
|
(...) So buying something for a fair price (if it wasn't fair why did the seller sell it?) then selling it for a ton of money is robbery? (...) And put it to infinitely better use than Xerox was willing to do, in addition to using it more (...) (25 years ago, 11-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Traffic Page Problem with Netscape Communicator 4.6
|
|
(...) Any serious Machead will tell you this is childs play to pin on Bill. Here's the reasoning. Windows unfairly dominates the world - Therefore people write for Windows first - Therefore stuff gets ported from a crappy system to a blessed (...) (25 years ago, 14-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Traffic Page Problem with Netscape Communicator 4.6
|
|
(...) We're talking about macheads here, not reality. Just ask John Neal, he lives in an alternate reality. At least that's the only explanation I've been able to divine, so far. (you didn't think **I** was saying this was true, right?) (25 years ago, 14-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Traffic Page Problem with Netscape Communicator 4.6
|
|
(...) Yeah, but it breaks down at this point because the reality of the world we live in (where the PC is THE computer and the Mac is mostly a single-digit percentage also-ran) exists not only because of the massive far-reaching evil power of Bill (...) (25 years ago, 14-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Traffic Page Problem with Netscape Communicator 4.6
|
|
(...) No, you're too intelligent to see the Mac as anything more than it is (or is likely ever to be) - an "if only" or a "coulda-been". (25 years ago, 14-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
