 | | Re: problem with dat groups.
|
|
(...) There are a lot of things I don't like about the new interface, but this one is about at the top of my list... Everyone else is doing fine in categorising my dislikes so I won't bother repeating them... (25 years ago, 29-Jun-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: problem with dat groups.
|
|
(...) Hmm, I kept wondering what you mean, because it -is- there on the group intro pages, but maybe you mean the direct NNTP link from the article display page? (Did anyone actually use those on a message by message basis?) (...) A lot of things (...) (25 years ago, 29-Jun-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: problem with dat groups.
|
|
(...) Well, when my IE4 browser url field displays (URL) don't get a "open in newsreader" link on the page. I did use it from time to time, especially when threads went many directions, as people forget to alter subject lines to more accurately (...) (25 years ago, 29-Jun-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: problem with dat groups.
|
|
(...) yes and yes. I liked it when it offered both the regular and :8080 link, as I am still using :8080 (...) I'll try to spend some time with it, but I'd say the font sizes are still small. (25 years ago, 29-Jun-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: problem with dat groups.
|
|
(...) Oh. OK, I see. That's not an intro (=introductory) page to the group but rather a secondary page. But it's still one that you probably use a lot(?) and maybe even the one you always use to enter the group(?). Hmmm. Is it OK if the direct-NNTP (...) (25 years ago, 29-Jun-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: problem with dat groups.
|
|
(...) Oh my! You've got me confused now! Where on earth was there ever before links to either of the :8000 or :8080 port versions? I just grepped the old stuff and don't see it anywhere. I think the only place it was ever even mentioned is on the (...) (25 years ago, 29-Jun-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: problem with dat groups.
|
|
(...) I was babbling. But if I WERE speaking coherently I might have said something like that, except c /8000/8080/ (note no * as I only want to change the first occurance). (25 years ago, 30-Jun-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad)
|
