 | | Re: Problem with traffic page
|
|
(...) Hi Tim, I have yet to figure out what went wrong - haven't seen this happening in a loooong time. Thanks for pointing me to this issue, Jerry (18 years ago, 3-Jul-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: My fault
|
|
Hello there! I'm going to Seoul, Korea in a few months for business, and was wondering if any one knew 'ANYTHING' about Lego in Korea... Do major department stores stock newer sets...are the prices similar?!? Is there any Korean-Canadians out there (...) (18 years ago, 11-Jul-07, to lugnet.loc.kr, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: My fault
|
|
(...) This might not be what you want to hear, but you may be able to find Oxford sets on the shelves in Korea. Oxford is a remarkably high quality clone brand 100% compatible with LEGO, Mega Bloks, and the like, and it includes a range of unusual (...) (18 years ago, 11-Jul-07, to lugnet.loc.kr, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | LUGNET aircraft group?
|
|
This newsgroup (lugnet.build.military) is great for posting military aircraft, such as (URL) Ralph Savelsberg's F-117A and Su-27>. But there's really no suitable place for civilian aircraft. I know that LUGNET has been in a pretty static state for a (...) (18 years ago, 31-Jul-07, to lugnet.build.military, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET aircraft group?
|
|
(...) I'd like to see this group too (lugnet.build.aircraft would be my preferred location). I tend to build civilian aircraft and would like somewhere neat to post them. Tim (18 years ago, 1-Aug-07, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET aircraft group?
|
|
Sure, why not? Magnus (18 years ago, 6-Aug-07, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: How many times will this post appear?
|
|
(...) Does this mean that you an Al may have found some of the problem? Tim (18 years ago, 10-Aug-07, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: How many times will this post appear?
|
|
(...) Is it when you fup-to less than you originally post? Tim (18 years ago, 10-Aug-07, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET aircraft group?
|
|
(...) This would be sweet. I've got a couple different civilian aircraft and that would be a great place to post them. -Dave (18 years ago, 10-Aug-07, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Bug in current version of LDList
|
|
I first replied almost three hours ago, but for some reason e-mail authentication never got this posted. I had to send it again and authenticate on the web page to get the message to appear?? FUT: lugnet.admin.general (...) (18 years ago, 22-Aug-07, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Long delay between email post and authentication request
|
|
(...) Experiencing the same thing. Email reply posted 22:53 Authentication request received 04:11 (18 years ago, 23-Aug-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Long delay between email post and authentication request
|
|
(...) Ummm. Authentication response sent at 07:20 Am I now going to have to wait another 5 and a quarter hours for this to actually appear on the list? (18 years ago, 23-Aug-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Long delay between email post and authentication request
|
|
(...) @all, I have identified a substantial increase of Spam to the mail-gateway, which basically resulted in an "overfull" queue of deferred bounces (the mail gateway does send a response to the original sender if for any reasons it cannot accept a (...) (18 years ago, 23-Aug-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Long delay between email post and authentication request
|
|
(...) I have *no* problems with getting the initial "Message awaiting authentication" mail, it has (almost) always arrived within a minute. The problem is that if I auth by replying to the email, it will take an enormous amount of time before the (...) (18 years ago, 23-Aug-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Long delay between email post and authentication request
|
|
@all, I have dug into the issue a bit more, and having spent the last 2 hours or so working through the mail queues, I have found that the mail gateway for LUGNET news is currently being drowned in spam to invalid addresses. The active queue is now (...) (18 years ago, 23-Aug-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | New Lugnet member profile name problem
|
|
This summer I joined Lugnet. In my profile ((URL) my name appears repeated many times, as if my full name were entered for both my first and last names (it is not inconceivable I did this by accident myself). For example, where "John Smith" appears (...) (18 years ago, 24-Aug-07, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | LUGNET needs a Lounge
|
|
.fun/.pun are for FUs when threads swerve OT; .debate has contentious connotations. A lounge would provide true OT living, where the pithy and the clever could congregate and gentle smack would be allowed-- like an .rtl, without all of the (...) (18 years ago, 23-Oct-07, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET needs a Lounge
|
|
(...) Wow, that is a great name! This would've been a great alternative to the .off-topic name, back in the beginning... wish we'd thought of it then! --Todd (18 years ago, 23-Oct-07, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET needs a Lounge
|
|
(...) The name "lounge" for an ot forum is not my idea, mind you. But I disagree. I like the way off-topic works; I just think an o-t.lounge might be in order. The OTL. I'd hang there, just like the Friends who hung out in Central Perk (how was that (...) (18 years ago, 23-Oct-07, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET needs a Lounge
|
|
(...) Gee John, if that's your real name. Where did you get that idea? Tell THE TRUTH and don't HATE ME. Seriously: John's rampant conceptual pilfering notwithstanding, I think that this would be a nice idea to try out, so I second the motion if (...) (18 years ago, 23-Oct-07, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
