 | | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee —David Eaton
|
| | | (...) Another personal preference: don't call it a committee. Treat it casually. "We asked some people if they wouldn't mind giving us some feedback". Calling it a committee implies that it's a group with power and responsibility. It could possibly (...) (19 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee — Kelly McKiernan
|
| | | | | (...) For informal functions, that's probably a good idea. The LPRV, on the other hand, did/does have real power and responsibility: the power to change and steer and directly influence an important part of LUGNET's direction, and the responsibility (...) (19 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee —Kevin L. Clague
|
| | | | | | | In lugnet.admin.general, Kelly McKiernan wrote: <snip> (...) Nowhere in the charter did it say "stay on task and avoid time-consuming loops like debating personalities or picking apart past actions". Why would you create a charter with the working (...) (19 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee — Kelly McKiernan
|
| | | | | | | | (...) That was my paraphrasing of the original information I saw about the purpose for the committee, I apologize for not being specific. (...) I'm assuming the "you" is directed at the LTT, and not me personally, so I'll respond as such. The (...) (19 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee —Kevin L. Clague
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) <snip> (...) You are correct. I was referring to the LTT as a group. Had you been chair I would have had much more faith in the process. <snip> (...) It most certainly was what I received. (...) I do not beleive that the way Chris was (...) (19 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee —David Eaton
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) I think this is a fantastic discussion-- one that we started on the list, but (as I've said on the list) I *REALLY* want admin feedback like this from admins on a continual basis. Seriously, this is the most effectual I've felt yet about the (...) (19 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | | | | In lugnet.admin.general, Kelly McKiernan wrote: Thanks, Kelly, for your comments about this. I have only one point I'd like to make: (...) Whereas I think it is inevitable *eventually*. That's not a slur against admins, it's just human nature. But (...) (19 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee —David Eaton
|
| | | | | | (...) Well, as far as I could tell, the LPRV pretty much just had the privilage to see the document before it went into effect. And, I'm not opposed to that, really. I mean, I fully recognize and support the desire to strengthen a document before (...) (19 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: LPRV? —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | | (...) Well, I had to pick somewhere to ask this, I chose here... I would like to know where the "V" came from? I never saw anything that started with "V" attached to (URL) the committee charter>, only the "V" in "review". Was it just a typo that (...) (19 years ago, 26-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: LPRV? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) The V in review. I didn't pick it! Matt did I think because he set up the list (1) I would have went with LPPRC (Lugnet Policy & Procedure Review Committee) Too late now though! 1 - you do-s the work you get-s to picks the acronymie-s (19 years ago, 26-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee —Kevin L. Clague
|
| | | | (...) <snip> (...) This is a huge point. Proofreaders. My perception of the group was that we were not able to agree or disagree with anything in the document, rather we were to simply point out syntax and grammar mistakes. Given that I openly don't (...) (19 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee —Kevin L. Clague
|
| | | | In lugnet.admin.general, Kevin L. Clague wrote: <snip> (...) Larry has provided me with convincing evidence that the email breakdown from his work to me on yahoo was not his doing. I will ask this though, given that you knew the email conduit was (...) (19 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
