| | Re: wish's
|
| (...) First, this has nothing to do with rtlToronto. Some of our members may dislike Larry, some may like him. In general, the sentiment up here tends to lean to the former from what I can tell. Regardless, it has nothing to do with the group (...) (20 years ago, 3-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | Re: wish's
|
| (...) Elsewhere he can, subject to the rules and regulations, if any, of whatever place he does so. Not here. Here he is subject to the ToS like everyone else. So, to say that "he can do whatever he wants" is false, unless you add the codicil, "and (...) (20 years ago, 3-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | Re: wish's
|
| (...) I guess he took the gloves off too. (...) In your own words, why do you see it that way? (...) Is cross-posting creating problems? If it is, we could set the "can't crosspost to" bit on .org.ca.rtltoronto, which would mediate the amount of (...) (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | Re: wish's
|
| (...) I don't see him posting this contest here. He posted on "JLUG". There's a difference. (...) First, they're your words in that post. It's obvious Chris doesn't like you, but I wouldn't call that baiting by any means. If you didn't want to have (...) (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general) !
| | | | Re: wish's
|
| (...) Yes. Weeks. This has been brewing for weeks, It only piqued in the last few days. But people have been bickering (from both sides) on this topic for weeks. (...) All your words are on the good list, but your tone is clearly provacative. Do you (...) (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | (canceled)
|
| | | | | Re: wish's
|
| (...) Hi Todd, Here's why I see that certain administrators are hurting Lugnet: They're operating in the shadows and there's no transparency to the process. The rules aren't clearly defined, so there's a lot of murkiness as to how they operate. (...) (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | Re: wish's
|
| (...) Wow, that was more than I was expecting. Thanks for taking the time to share your thoughts and for being candid. (...) I think you are definitely onto something here, in that perceptions are that the line is sometimes set arbitrarily. I don't (...) (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | Re: wish's
|
| (...) By the way, I don't mean to imply that the line isn't ever arbitrary. Maybe sometimes it is -- unintentionally, of course. This is something that needs wringing out. --Todd (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | Re: wish's
|
| Larry, You of all people should be the last person commenting on this. Nothing reeks more of conflict of interest or abuse of power then you rendering an explanation for Chris' banning. Derek (20 years ago, 5-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | Re: wish's
|
| (...) I have to agree with what Calum has posted. I would further like to add my own personal comments: 1. We can ALL agree that the contest was not posted here on Lugnet until the Lugnet Administrator (Lenny Hoffman) posted reference to it. I can (...) (20 years ago, 7-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | Re: wish's
|
| (...) That is quite possibly the most hilarious thing I have ever read. Iain (20 years ago, 8-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |