 | | Re: Shop@Home Nightmare! (from a now ex-AFOL)
|
|
(...) Jamie, if you have all that time, could you please post some of your creations. If you have already, could you please post a link to them so I can see them. I hope you get well soon, and that you begin to realize that there are people in the (...) (20 years ago, 13-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Mini Set Availablity
|
|
(...) ACK! I can't believe I did that! D'OH!! Well, I'm back to normal posting id now, heh. -Lenny (20 years ago, 10-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET server response code 0
|
|
(...) I don't know WHY but I do see this a fair bit. Often just before the server goes into "server under heavy load, try again later" mode. When it happens to me, rather than refreshing (and possibly losing my words of wisdom unless I copied them (...) (20 years ago, 7-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | LUGNET server response code 0
|
|
When I post replies (by web interface) I often find that the LUGNET server will continually send 0 as a response until I restart my browser, or refresh the original post's page - and then, with some luck it will accept the post. I certainly don't (...) (20 years ago, 7-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Cool Lego Site of the Week
|
|
Hey all! Are there any plans in the very near future to start up the CLSotW? I know it went by the wayside for a while and was supposed to start up again. What's the word? (20 years ago, 4-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Spammer Using LUGNET?
|
|
"Janey Cook" <janeyofthejungle@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:I84M6E.4AI@lugnet.com... (...) Janey, I know it will be expensive for you to do so, but I would strongly recommend you upgrade your antivirus program to something that is the latest (...) (20 years ago, 3-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Spammer Using LUGNET?
|
|
(...) Looks like some spammer or script kiddie (or worm) figured out that LUGNET is a good domain to spoof return addresses from. It is very very unlikely (although not impossible, I suppose, but it would have to be something that works on Linux) (...) (20 years ago, 3-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Spammer Using LUGNET?
|
|
(...) From I Wed Dec 1 00:19:32 2004 X-Apparently-To: janeyofthejungle@yah...SPAM0).com via 206.190.38.187; Wed, 01 Dec 2004 00:23:21 -0800 X-YahooFilteredBulk: 202.88.182.35 X-Originating-IP: [202.88.182.35] Return-Path: <i6w8e7.1c0p@lugnet.com> (...) (20 years ago, 3-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Spammer Using LUGNET?
|
|
(...) 6 days ago I cleared my "spam" folder, and today there is a total of 9 pieces of spam, and 6 of them (one from each day) is this same user with the lugnet.com address, each mail has a different subject, and the attachment is slightly different (...) (20 years ago, 3-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: I love Lego
|
|
!Wow, God, all the people who replied to this post are so defensive and protective of TLG. This is simply a personally statement of an individual who's valid concerns has caused him to express his feelings to TLG. This is directed to them...not you, (...) (20 years ago, 26-Nov-04, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.announce, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.people, lugnet.general) !
|
| |
| | Re: Spammer Using LUGNET?
|
|
(...) Yes, I am getting them as well, I get one a day with that lugnet.com addy, always with an attachment which I just assumed is a virus, so I have just deleted them. Janey "Red Brick" (20 years ago, 25-Nov-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Spammer Using LUGNET?
|
|
Has anyone else received an email with this address? I5zJ6s.rDJ@lugnet.com I got my fifth such email and all five have had some virus or worm in them. Thanks, Adr. (20 years ago, 23-Nov-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Ten cheers for Jake
|
|
(...) Yes, but LUGNET admins do not cancel user's posts without the direct consent of the User. This is stated policy as contained in the ToS - which you, as a User, should have read and understood. The User who used the "f-word" over twenty times (...) (20 years ago, 21-Nov-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Ten cheers for Jake
|
|
Hello! (...) The issue is not the F-word itself in my as always more than humble opinion. It is just one syllable composed of three phonemes (the sounds /f/, /A/ and /k/) when you speak it out loud, using four graphemes (the letters 'f', 'u', 'c' (...) (20 years ago, 21-Nov-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
