Subject:
|
Re: Un-spotlight? (was: suspended Bricklink shops)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 26 Aug 2004 14:07:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
223 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Ross Crawford wrote:
> Which gets me thinking, why not also have a "un-spotlight" function? Not to
> remove a spot light I've previously set (which I can already do), but to
> subtract from the spotlights of others (subtract 100 or whatever from its points
> value). So if I think a news item that has made the top stories isn't all that
> newsworthy, I can vote to remove it.
Wouldn't that be pretty much exactly like the original voting system as Todd
implemented it? I liked it that way, but it created such furor that it was
replaced by the current more friendly system.
Chris
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Un-spotlight?
|
| (...) Perhaps Ross is suggesting something slightly different-- IE that *if* something has spotlight votes, that you can veto them, but that you can't veto non-existant spotlights (in other words you can't downvote a regular post) Of course, the (...) (20 years ago, 26-Aug-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
