 | | Re: CLSOTW links
|
|
(...) Hmm, that sounds like an interesting feature, ASSUMING Mozilla doesn't have the problem I have with Netscape. Netscape has a habit of going on vacation while loading certain things (I think resolving a host name is one thing) where it doesn't (...) (22 years ago, 7-Dec-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Coolest LEGO Experience?
|
|
(...) that article, it doesn't word wrap, so each paragraph comes out as one really long line. Has something gone wacky with the way Lugnet generates the HTML? Frank (22 years ago, 6-Dec-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CLSOTW links
|
|
(...) Can't you right click on the link and ask to open in a new window? My preference is for sites to let me decide to open a link in a new window or not. If I'm following links I don't always want to fill my screen with more and more windows. (...) (22 years ago, 6-Dec-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: CLSOTW links
|
|
(...) Ya, what Larry said. Ronald, I'm curious what web browser you're using. Currently, the best web browser (IMHO) is the latest Mozilla with tabbed browsing. And in the Preferences > Navigator > Tabbed Browsing dialog, you can even check [x] Load (...) (22 years ago, 6-Dec-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: CLSOTW links
|
|
(...) Right mouse click on the link and choose "Open in new window" doesn't work for you? (...) Using the back button doesn't work for you? Hm... you may want to consider getting a new browser if those features aren't working. I'd prefer that (...) (22 years ago, 6-Dec-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | CLSOTW links
|
|
Small request: Could you make the links to candidates for Cool Site appear in a new window? I often check out those sites and find it annoying the take over the Lugnet window, making it tricky to get back. Duq (22 years ago, 6-Dec-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: busy again
|
|
(...) I request that you and Jim go off and buy a house, move lotsa LEGO into the house, and enjoy the LEGO... I mean the house. Dave K. (22 years ago, 6-Dec-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | busy again
|
|
Just wanted to let folks know that, although wedding stuff is all over, Jim and I are now in the process of buying a house - so I might be a little slow in responding to requests. -Suz (22 years ago, 6-Dec-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: Why sets receive a ZERO?
|
|
(...) Then maybe Todd should just make the current votes available as a .zip download (or whatever) and those who wish can play with it to their hearts content. ROSCO (22 years ago, 19-Nov-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Why sets receive a ZERO?
|
|
(...) I'm not sure information impracticality is really an excuse for inaccurate or misleading information. I think the point is that if we *can* get more accurate information, why not do it? Clearly this topic interests some people who actively (...) (22 years ago, 19-Nov-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | LUGNET password reset requiest
|
|
Please reset my LUGNET password. Thanks. -Ted Michon member 1666 (22 years ago, 18-Nov-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Why sets receive a ZERO?
|
|
(...) I think part of the problem is people buy sets for different reasons. I (for example) would've rated the set you mentioned a 70 because I'd love it for part selection; though the model itself doesn't really intreuge me to buy it. I think what (...) (22 years ago, 18-Nov-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Why sets receive a ZERO?
|
|
(...) Heh-- I actually did something very similar for our company when we were sending out our customer service surveys (rated 1-5). Obviously some clients were overly thrilled with us and just gave us straight 5's. Some were mad at us and gave us (...) (22 years ago, 18-Nov-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Where should Bricklink auctions be posted ?
|
|
(...) At this time, according to the charter for lugnet.market.auction, that is the ONLY place where auction announcments of any type are permitted. Discussions about auctions are permissible in market.theory and other groups as appropriate. Some (...) (22 years ago, 16-Nov-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Where should Bricklink auctions be posted ?
|
|
(...) under auctions, please. -Suz (22 years ago, 15-Nov-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Where should Bricklink auctions be posted ?
|
|
Not meaning to open up old issues, but... Bricklink now supports auctions (after a long hiatus). Where should announcements of BrickLink auctions be posted ? lugnet.market.auction or lugnet.market.brickshops or both/either Ray (who has a turkey up (...) (22 years ago, 15-Nov-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: a few new things
|
|
Ahh! I am an annoying one I know. :) I am glad you are back Suz because I love sharing my 2 cents. Anyway, was the new frontpage design scrapped or still in dev? Just curious. I do webs sites and wouldn't mind helping if you want. Of course, this is (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: T-Shirts
|
|
(...) Jeremy, I did see the earlier post, but then only had time to mark it as 'something to look into later.' I do appreciate the suggestions very much. Ironically, while pouring coffee this morning (into a LUGNET mug), I thought (for the umpteenth (...) (22 years ago, 11-Nov-02, to lugnet.admin.finance, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: T-Shirts
|
|
I sure hope that with no response or personal emails posted that this was taken into consideration, but I feel that it may not have been seen. Therefore, hoping I am not stepping on anyone's toes, I am reposting this. I hope this very logical idea (...) (22 years ago, 11-Nov-02, to lugnet.admin.finance, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Polls with multi options
|
|
(...) Great idea, Dan! I didn't know how I would implement this at first, but it turned out to be fairly straightforward by setting any "n/a" (shown as "---") options as last-place ties. Thus, if you write in 1, 2, 3, and leave the rest untouched, (...) (22 years ago, 11-Nov-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
