 | | Re: Attack of the ABS addiction (Wal-Mart = EVIL) —Richard Noeckel
|
| | | (...) Take it easy there *“TOY IN RECTUM” ;) We’re only discussing creative anagrams here. Anyway, Iian didn’t even create those… He’s just reiterating what the “Internet Anagram Server” concluded. (URL) the site is just plain neat, he wasn’t trying (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Attack of the ABS addiction (Wal-Mart = EVIL) —James Brown
|
| | | | | In lugnet.admin.general, Richard Noeckel writes: ... <snip> (...) Tired of it or not, this is still a site meant to be accessable to children, and I would prefer to be able to allow my children to read here (when they're old enough). Please honor (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Attack of the ABS addiction (Wal-Mart = EVIL) —Jude Beaudin
|
| | | | | (...) I am sorry Richard, but I think Tim is right in the way he asked Iain to refrain from using that language. It is not like he went and asked for a ban. He just let Iain know of the offensive nature of what was posted. Perhaps it was something (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Words… —Richard Noeckel
|
| | | | | | | (...) No fighting, I haven’t even donned my flame-suit! :) I believe that I put it quite eloquently, talking about “creative anagram” usage, and “relevant content.” (...) Hey, I too agree with Tim, but I just wanted to provide context to the (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Words… —James Brown
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Children are curious. I know when I (as a child) found I word I didn't know, I looked it up. All sorts of things children (IMHO) shouldn't be casually exposed to show up in any 'net search engine by inserting one or two of the words Iain used. (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Words… —Dave Johann
|
| | | | | | | | Ah, well....I stayed away as long as I could, but you who what they say about opinions....everybody has one. (...) Interesting. So children use the internet unsupervised, I assume? Funny, but whenever my father let me touch any part of his gun (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Words… —James Brown
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I completely agree. I don't intend to let my children access the 'net unsupervised until I'm confident they're mature enough to choose & judge their own content. But I also don't wear blinders, and I'm well aware that I am not the only access (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Attack of the ABS addiction (Wal-Mart = EVIL) —Benjamin Medinets
|
| | | | | | snipped due to some excess vulgarity (...) well.....please don't consider my words "ready to fight" but... I feel that there are certain instances where there has been a clear violation of the TOS and it took a while for the violater to be warned of (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Attack of the ABS addiction (Wal-Mart = EVIL) —Enrique Durand
|
| | | | (...) Okay, how about people who simply (and perhaps naively) expect others to abide by the TOS they agreed to when joining LUGnet? Iain's and your posts were, at the very least, vulgar and innapropriate for this forum. (...) If their TOS do not (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
