 | | Re: New announce.moc group needed? (Was: Bulk Lego Auctions)
|
|
(...) I hope you don't assume that Todd (or anyone else) is 'absent' from these forums when he doesn't respond loudly, swiftly and/or directly to each of your remarks. I, for one, have been here every day - listening to your comments. (...) Then it (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general) !
|
| |
| | Re: New announce.moc group needed? (Was: Bulk Lego Auctions)
|
|
(...) Dunno. I hope so. I was encouraged by his postings. I'm very very glad to see him saying things even when they're things I may not agree with (the LD thing) (...) Yes, I think so. People should start posting very VERY gentle reminders (with a (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New announce.moc group needed? (Was: Bulk Lego Auctions)
|
|
(...) I'd be happy with .announce.moc. As you say, you get the choice with the view plain - us technic-heads have already had to get used to this with bionicle 8?/ and it's OK once you get used to it. Just means you've gotta individually check all (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New announce.moc group needed? (Was: Bulk Lego Auctions)
|
|
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:GpIu2r.4zr@lugnet.com... (...) MOCs. (...) laws (...) The MOC posts in .announce continue despite Todd's word on it. Will Todd take futher action to enforce what he said? Is it (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New announce.moc group needed? (Was: Bulk Lego Auctions)
|
|
(...) Yep, this was suggested elsewhere in the thread and it has a lot of merit. My preference would be for build.announce as that keeps the announce tree low traffic. (yes, you could view .announce without subgroups but then you miss (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | New announce.moc group needed? (Was: Bulk Lego Auctions)
|
|
Hello Larry, hello everybody, I would suggest to create a new group lugnet.announce.moc. Most of the postings some people find unappropriate for any of the other lugnet.announce.* groups could probably fit there ... Greetings Horst (25 years ago, 6-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Bulk Lego Auctions
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Allan Bedford writes: <mostly well considered and not disagreed to by me so I snipped it> except for this: (...) No, it *isn't* just my opinion... it seems to be the opinion of the person who wrote the charter. And he ought (...) (25 years ago, 5-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Bulk Lego Auctions
|
|
(...) I think this is where we may have gotten off track Larry. I *suspect* you may be very interested in having the charter(s) updated as a way of addressing your pet peeve(s). And this is should have been understood by me. It wasn't and I (...) (25 years ago, 5-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Bulk Lego Auctions
|
|
(...) Would having a link in the nntp headers to the groups charter (as a 'X-' line) be of any help? It'd allow you to go to any post and click on it and get the charter. Since the Web already has a equivalent (the link in corner thing) so it could (...) (25 years ago, 5-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Bulk Lego Auctions
|
|
(...) This was a good suggestion, and needs to be expanded to the web interface: On the page for posting a message, there could be either the entire text of the charter for the group being posted/replied to, or at least a link to it. To cover (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
