To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / *9311 (-10)
  Logging in?
 
Hello, I hope this is the right place for this... Do I read correctly somewhere that if you login to Lugnet, your posts appear automatically again? i.e. You don't need to confirm them. If so, I would love to take advantage of this! Which leads to my (...) (25 years ago, 10-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Request for a link
 
Todd, Would it be possible to add a link on the RCX/NQC page to my webpage for RcxCC version 3.2 (my revision to Mark Overmars original RcxCC). I've had a few people email me asking where it can be found and invariably they had looked for a link (...) (25 years ago, 10-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Confirmations through Web URL don't work
 
I've had no problem with it, perhaps because i'm logged in via the web interface as well? I like the new confirmation thingy, I wouldn't ever want any more impersonations. :/ (...) (25 years ago, 9-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Confirmations through Web URL don't work
 
I've tried posting three messages in the new system since confirmation was required. The first two I did by clicking the confirmation URL and choosing the "post now" option on the web page. Neither posts ever showed up. Only the email-reply option (...) (25 years ago, 9-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: FOTM/LOTM (Loss of the Month) Some thoughts...
 
(...) It looked (to me) like it was veering off into class warfare, that is, bashing sellers for making a profit. That, in my opinion, is .debate fodder. However I was wrong about that veer and I have said so already. (25 years ago, 7-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: FOTM/LOTM (Loss of the Month) Some thoughts...
 
(...) WARNING! Compartmentalized Dork-dom ahead! ;] Larry, I'm not sure why you're so convinced this isn't a .general topic. The discussion was about general "market goings-on" for LEGO. By its "charter", lugnet.off-topic.debate is for non-LEGO (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Bug, or feature
 
Todd, Just noticed something and I'm not sure whether it's a bug, or a feature. I am currently logged in. The icon in the upper right is grey and says "sign out". That seems to be the case on most pages with the exception of the member pages. (URL) (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Newsgroup request for MAALFD
 
Wow, this shows how long I've been away from Lugnet. I was just thinking that it would be nice if we had this newsgroup because I have had like no Lego motivation lately and haven't even been checking other fire related websites for updates which is (...) (25 years ago, 5-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Possible New Group?
 
I was wondering if there could be a new newsgroup added for discusions about military topics and such. As far as I know, us military fans don't really have anywhere to post new models/ideas/discussions to except .build, or .space if it's futristic. (...) (25 years ago, 5-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: How much to licence Lugnet technology?
 
In lugnet.admin.general, Alex Farlie writes: <snip> I know Todd had at one point thought that he might release the underlying tech, but I suspect (speculate, guess, seem to recall, made up statements, take your pick) that the code at this point is (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.general)

Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more
Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR