 | | Re: Web interface "ignore user"
|
| (...) Your points are valid. Mostly I was asking to see if it was easy. However I would posit that the functionality of being able to filter, sort, omit and in general slice and dice content as you like is very powerful and does fit the charter. (...) (26 years ago, 8-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: LUGNET Memberships
|
| Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:G23324.HEu@lugnet.com... (...) presumably (...) would (...) people (...) Well, Todd, I don't think anything is necessary, but it's your choice. Here's what I would suggest: Eliminate the (...) (26 years ago, 8-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Web interface "ignore user"
|
| (...) Unless there's evidence of a lot of demand, my response in your position would be "Use a newsreader for reading, and use the web interface for searching". Far from ideal, yes, but: a. It's available now, b. It allows people who want the (...) (26 years ago, 8-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Reducing fussiness in automated password appraisal
|
| (...) I'd say level 2 is too easy. My current password doesn't fail until level 8. And one I'm playing with, trying to get the pattern down in my head and with my fingers, gets an outstanding even at level 12. (26 years ago, 8-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: LUGNET Memberships
|
| (...) I would suggest putting the following parts (marked by * *) in bold or in red. a. "Your *real-life* name will appear automatically ...." b. "In other words, *you must not conceal your real-life name* or *your real e- mail address* from other (...) (26 years ago, 8-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
