 | | Re: compartmentalized dorks redux
|
|
(...) I don't remember flatly rejecting it, but I remember a lot of opinions on both sides of the issue -- people who think it would be a good idea and people who think it would be a bad idea. More likely (and I lean toward thinking perhaps it's (...) (26 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: compartmentalized dorks redux
|
|
(...) I think market.theme was preffered over theme.market, but none were seen as being better than the existing setup. As user numbers increase I expect things will change... but who knows when the numbers will begin to justify that? I suppose (...) (26 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: compartmentalized dorks redux
|
|
(...) I thought we took this already to a conclusion a few months ago. AFAIR, I think Todd flatly rejected it. I think it is a good idea, but it is me after all, and I am weird. I'll let the all-mighty Todd craft the ever elegant answer to your (...) (26 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | compartmentalized dorks redux
|
|
Hi ... I'm a compartmentalized dork ... :^) I'd be surprised if this hasn't been suggested, but why not have a lugnet.castle.marketplace, a lugnet.space.marketplace, lugnet.starwars.marketplace, etc? This is a subtly different idea than having a (...) (26 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Which sets had these slopes in them?
|
|
Uh... duh. I said XP, but didn't. :-) (...) (26 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.db.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: Which sets had these slopes in them?
|
|
XP .db.inv (...) <snip> I agree. Hmmm... I'm thinking something along the lines of slightly changing the charter for .db.inv (or alternatively, creating a new group). If the charter was changed from... (...) to, for example... : lugnet.db.inv: : (...) (26 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Which sets had these slopes in them?
|
|
(...) And what about the import tariffs? (...) Let's see... You posted to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary, lugnet.db.inv, and lugnet.db.scans. The charters for these groups are (actually, were, since I just jumped back to message: (...) (26 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: fa New Lego Parts - Many Yellow Slopes
|
|
(...) You are correct - I just zapped it. It was a complete mistake, my previous post was an auction post posted from .technic, but to .auction. I must have forgot I was still logged on to that group. Sorry Scott A (26 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: fa New Lego Parts - Many Yellow Slopes
|
|
(...) I don't think this should go in lugnet.technic. Fredrik (26 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Which sets had these slopes in them?
|
|
And here in Aussie, we'd probably get 10% added onto that for GST because it's a 'service'. :) I think I should officially ask Todd Lehman (*invokes 'summon god' spell*) so that we may *all* have somewhere to post parts queries. How far off was I (...) (26 years ago, 10-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
