 | | Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
|
|
(...) I personally would be more convinced if you could find some threads that SHOULD be there, but aren't. Also include whether those threads have been spotlighted or not. If Lugnet is about LEGO, and LEGO MOCs in particular, I think added weight (...) (21 years ago, 17-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
|
|
(...) Replying to my own post and I don't think anyone is really looking at this thread anymore anyway, even though it continues to be a "top stories" item. I just wanted to metion that now, 24 hours later, the conditions of the above referenced (...) (21 years ago, 17-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
|
|
(...) I don't know about LUGNET's highlighting, but as for Brickshelf - when I hit reload/refresh, the only thing that seems to change is the "ad" that seems to be randomly placed amoung the folder spots. The folders' order of appearance does not (...) (21 years ago, 16-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
|
|
(...) The space people (myself included) are in the process of transitioning to the Classic Space forums ((URL)). These forums use a more modern, more standard, web based discussion group engine. This is the same sort of engine that I've seen at (...) (21 years ago, 16-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
|
|
(...) As a software developer, I don’t think this would be all *that* bad, at least performance wise. First, you’d calculate a ranking of postings which would be similar to how you create the spotlight list today. Call this new (internal list) the (...) (21 years ago, 16-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
|
|
(...) Actually, the easiest way to make this work for everyone is to have the weighting of the spotlights settable for each person's account. That way if I really care about color postings, I can weight that higher than someone who's sick and tired (...) (21 years ago, 16-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
|
|
(...) You'd think people would do this, but they clearly don't. It's "too hard" for people to post their pictures to their Bricklink folders, wait for them to be moderated, then post to Lugnet. It's easier for people to do both at the same time (or (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
|
|
Here is a good example: (URL) highlights or spotlights. Post has coding mistakes making it difficult to find the pictures The model (imho) is nothing special. The photos are (imho) poor quality. Yet it is on the top stories (#5, just before this (...) (21 years ago, 16-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
|
|
(...) But don't forget that people reading through news readers are not able to highlight even if they are members! (21 years ago, 14-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
|
|
(...) This one, (URL) had not had the brickshelf gallery moderated when I viewed it yesterday but it appeared on the front page. (I'm not saying it wouldn't deserve it when moderated) There wasn't really anything to base judgement on. Tim (21 years ago, 14-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
