 | | Re: Louisiana bans gay marriages
|
|
(...) We're talking about the same thing, the web based interface found here: (URL) OT and Admin groups are not blocked automatically by the system per se, that's just the default setting of your skip filter. If you look on the bottom of the main (...) (22 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.people.lgbt, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New poll: sexuality and Lugnet
|
|
(...) Rob's poll was very biased, so I took your advice, Todd. (URL) of course, that the LUGNET team can do what they want either way) ~Kevoh (22 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general) !
|
| |
| | Re: New poll: sexuality and Lugnet
|
|
(...) identity as it relates to sexuality, etc" is way to broad to be able to make a blanket decision. ROSCO (22 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New poll: sexuality and Lugnet
|
|
(...) create an .lgbt group) would be an interesting side-poll; or asking for a helpful-to-the-community rating (0-10) on each of the .people subgroups. Just a thought. --Todd (22 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New poll: sexuality and Lugnet
|
|
(...) With wording like that, there is probably an internship at Fox News awaiting. What next a poll on apple pie, the flag and motherhood ? The lynch mob had better keep an eye on the 'singles' newsgroup, who knows what tales of conquest await us (...) (22 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New poll: sexuality and Lugnet
|
|
(...) That does surprise me. Now I'm curious-- what does made someone gay? Merely the fact that they are attracted to the same sex? What about heterosexuals who "opt into" the lifestyle? What makes them gay? JOHN (22 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New poll: sexuality and Lugnet
|
|
(...) I have a big problem with the way this poll is worded - its definitely one sided and misses the point of the 200+ postings on the main topic forum. It was explicity noted several times that "sexual topics" were NOT going to be discussed and (...) (22 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New poll: sexuality and Lugnet
|
|
(...) I think Terry's request is valid, Larry. Unless we've overlooked it somewhere (if so, please point it out), no statement has been provided to the LUGNET Membership explaining the decision-making rationale used for the newly created newsgroups. (...) (22 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New poll: sexuality and Lugnet
|
|
(...) See the charters of the newly created groups. Or review the discussion that has went on here. Or in particular, review Todd's posts, the same ones you commended me to take a look at. I'm not sure it's productive to produce a summary purely for (...) (22 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New poll: sexuality and Lugnet
|
|
(...) You're right, I haven't read the whole thread, as it is far too long and i worked 60 hours this week, so I was kind of busy and out of it for a few days. Since you are part of the decision-making progress, I'd like for an explanation on why (...) (22 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
