 | | Re: Idea for automatic Lugnet Set Database linking
|
|
(...) I was contemplating doing something similar a couple weeks ago when MikeS was talking about how much he used the search box... Rather than just giving a link into the DB, it really ought to (if it could) give a thumbnail and the set's data (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish, lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Does anyone have any good Windows software for collection inventorying?
|
|
(...) Oops, too much coffee for me today. I thought you were saying that they -were- there and that you were asking whether they'd been added recently. All I did above was checked the dates on the files and looked at the most recent change. Shouldda (...) (25 years ago, 10-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Does anyone have any good Windows software for collection inventorying?
|
|
I just checked (URL) and it does not include MSRP. In fact, I checked all of the ASCII lists and they are all dated 8 July and none of them contain MSRP data. Any idea why I can't see what you see? Mike - mike_walsh@mentorg.com (URL) Lehman wrote in (...) (25 years ago, 9-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Does anyone have any good Windows software for collection inventorying?
|
|
(...) If it wasn't already there earlier, the MSRP column was added to the listings at the URL above on 10 Jul 1998. The Picture-Y/N column was added on 8 Mar 1999. --Todd (25 years ago, 9-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Does anyone have any good Windows software for collection inventorying?
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) tools (...) count, (...) Have the MSRP values been added recently? The last time I downloaded these lists they didn't include MSRP data. I have a Windows/CE device which I can load Excel data into so the MSRP (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: The Lepanadat project (Was: Idea: How starting ... Lego piece naming convention?)
|
|
(...) Yes, there was a misunderstanding. I thought that you mentioned the name for this project, which you appearently did not. My goal has been changed slightly, from a name database to a searchable database with the different names that are used (...) (25 years ago, 9-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Classic Sets
|
|
4216 has now been released as a Classic set, 480 pcs (box) (looks like its the same set as the existing 4216 Basic) 4293 Classic Value Pack MSRP $29.99 (from sticker on box) 801 pcs (box). This set has the baseplate used in Sphynx Secret Surprise (...) (25 years ago, 9-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Newsgroup for this (was Re: The Bricktionary project)
|
|
(...) Right. Identification and reference and browsing and all that. Massively cross-referenced within itself and to/from set inventories, MOC's, and the marketplace. So it's really a sub-database of the larger database. The "Brictionary" part is (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Newsgroup for this (was Re: The Bricktionary project)
|
|
(...) Steve, I totally agree what is needed is a complete classification/taxonomy system so you can find a part. The naming component is useful and interesting but this project should be a parts database not just a name database. If the (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Idea: How starting to work for a unique Lego piece naming convention?
|
|
(...) Personally I prefer Gary Istoc. ;-) [f-up set to lugnet.off-topic.fun] -Tom McD. when replying, spamcake roping has just been outlawed by the Montana Rodeo Commission. (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: The Bricktionary project (Was: Idea: How starting ... Lego piece naming convention?)
|
|
(...) Great. I'd love to contribute to the Lugnet Bricktionary in any way possible. Of course, I'd love to contribute to just about any effort to establish a public db for part identification and reference. Steve (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Newsgroup for this (was Re: The Bricktionary project)
|
|
(...) Sounds good. Right place in the hierarchy. (...) And it's not actually part names, but a parts identification database, right? Having standard/prefered names is good, but it's the pictures (and maybe schematics) that actually identify the (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Idea: How starting to work for a unique Lego piece naming convention?
|
|
Doesn't seem like they were hidden to me. Just go to "www.lugnet.com", then click on the "Set Inventory Repository" link under "Links & Resources" at the left side of the page, and then select the "800 Town, Train, and other sets inventoried by Tim (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Newsgroup for this (was Re: The Bricktionary project)
|
|
This seems like it is reaching critical mass (a good thing) and perhaps at this point a dedicated newsgroup should be created for this (i.e., efforts to standardize parts nomenclature). How does lugnet.db.brictionary sound? I wouldn't quite put it (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: The Bricktionary project (Was: Idea: How starting ... Lego piece naming convention?)
|
|
(...) Oops -- I think there has been a major misunderstanding; that's not what I meant at all. When I wrote: TSL> As they say in Canada, Minnesota, and Maine, "O-ya, it's been parta da TSL> plan since day one." :-) Lots of little prototypes and (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: The Bricktionary project (Was: Idea: How starting ... Lego piece naming convention?)
|
|
John Van Zwieten wrote (...) Both great pages, I still ahve to add them, which is some work with the Technica page because the names of the parts are only in the pictures. I have to check if the parts on Lutz Uhlmann's page, that are also LDrawn (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: The Bricktionary project (Was: Idea: How starting ... Lego piece naming convention?)
|
|
(...) (I should have done that, discussion can be at one place) (...) That would be great (...) That is a good idea. The information I have till thus far still has included the name where it was used, so that might be possible. However, I still (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Idea: How starting to work for a unique Lego piece naming convention?
|
|
(...) I guess it looks fine with a "K"Gary Istok (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Idea: How starting to work for a unique Lego piece naming convention?
|
|
(...) And don't forget to include the folks in the Upper Penninsula of Michigan or Yoopers as they are called. "Dey talk like dat too". (...) I like it! Especially without a "K". John Matthews brought up an interesting point about not calling (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.general)
|
