 | | Re: Member details in set database moved to subpages
|
|
(...) oh, being QA, I have to mention... :) there's no way right now to get back to the set info, from any of the subpages... All in all, I didn't mind seeing everything there, but I do understand issues like server load and some comments... :/ (...) (24 years ago, 7-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Member details in set database moved to subpages
|
|
I personally would like the 4 sub pages on a single page. Formatted the way it used to be, just separately. (I actually liked the cookies idea best, so i could have the option, but i'll settle for the above :) ) 4 pages is not "at a glance". (...) (24 years ago, 7-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Member details in set database moved to subpages
|
|
(...) Still leaves a bottleneck, unfortunately. (...) You mean repeating the "My Collection" box in the sub-page(s)? Or glomming the four sub-pages into a single sub-page? --Todd (24 years ago, 7-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Member details in set database moved to subpages
|
|
(...) Back when the personal set data was first introduced to the Guide, Todd and I had discussed that very idea: (URL) to point 3). How about this idea?: If someone is a LUGNET member and are logged into LUGNET, they can toggle a setting that (...) (24 years ago, 7-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: New Lego Guide Look
|
|
(...) (URL) a CPU and bandwidth issue. In the extreme, some of the sets contain over 100 entries and the numbers are always going up. I thought about doing some kind of cutoff but I don't know how fair that would be. --Todd (24 years ago, 7-Mar-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Member details in set database moved to subpages
|
|
(...) The display of the lists on every set lookup was the number two bottleneck in the webserver's CPU load. --Todd (24 years ago, 7-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Member details in set database moved to subpages
|
|
(...) :-( You know more about LUGNET server load than I do, but is it really that much bandwidth to load some extra text? Not to sound negative. . .but seeing this a few minutes ago just depressed me. The utility of the LUGNET database has just (...) (24 years ago, 7-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Member details in set database moved to subpages
|
|
(...) I don't like it either, especially when it shows up right in your face on a set DB page. For reasons of server load and the above, I've moved the notes and buy/sell/own listings to subpages that you can click up if you want to see them. It (...) (24 years ago, 7-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Some data on set 2_7
|
|
(...) I just noticed that set 2_7 has been updated with a 149 piece count from the box of set 105, which directly contradicts the 184 piece count from an actual set #2 box. (24 years ago, 2-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | 1356 update
|
|
I bought myself a handful of small sets at TRU today, and have found data for one of them is missing from the database. So here's an update: 1356 Stunt Man Catapult - 27 pcs - 2 minifigs - $4.99 at TRU (24 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
