 | | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | New Life On Mars Set #7303
|
|
Subject says it all. According to previously found Life On Mars Value Packs we know that a special LEGO set numbered #7303 will be available later in 2001. Well, now here is the first picture: (URL) Christian --- xTI@N. ---...--- Lugnet Member #479 (...) (24 years ago, 15-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.general, lugnet.year.2001)
|
| |
| | Re: Set database correction
|
|
(...) fixed, thanks! (24 years ago, 13-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Set database correction
|
|
5561 Big Foot 4x4 has 748 pcs according to my boxes Frank (24 years ago, 13-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: 6618 Blue Racer - piece count
|
|
Just an update to this one, I posted to lugnet.db.inv recently. The Piece Count is 23 (...) (24 years ago, 12-Jan-01, to lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Plans to include LCAD or TLG part numbers on inventroy entries?
|
|
(...) The problem there is that the inventories at (URL) are pretty much static/dead data at this point. It's an area that's unlikely to get updated. I believe some of the inventories have been converted (with permission obtained from the list (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Plans to include LCAD or TLG part numbers on inventroy entries?
|
|
(...) Will Do. (...) I meant being able to get visual apperance of peices in the Lugnet Inventories which do not currently include Ldraw/TLG Part Numbers on inventory entries AFAIK. But I will check again.. Thanks!! Alex (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Plans to include LCAD or TLG part numbers on inventroy entries?
|
|
(...) It's a fake. (If I had a copy of Visio I'd have used that.) I'd previously fooled around with the idea of making something real like this for my own collection but the back-and-forth crossreferencing of parts and sets threw me for a loop. (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle set rating curiosity
|
|
(...) This is inherently a problem with any kind of open forum for evaluations. It is an interesting problem. I feel that eventually, for the web as a whole to be useful, there will have to be some kind of system which allows anyone to rate and (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle set rating curiosity
|
|
(...) I hate to resurrect this thread, but I've also noted another trend which disturbs me. I have been adding my name to the sets which I own, which means that I have been cycling through quite a few listings in the set database. I have run across (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Plans to include LCAD or TLG part numbers on inventroy entries?
|
|
(...) going on. (...) Is that a real database, or did you just make that to show how all these projects are related? I've been kicking around an idea for the past few month or so (I'll post details later this week, I hope) that requires some way to (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: Plans to include LCAD or TLG part numbers on inventroy entries?
|
|
(...) The plan is slowly coming together. The inventories at Peeron ((URL) have most of the parts linked to Partsref (if the part is LDrawn) or sometimes a photo taken by Dan and Jen, as well as a list of the sets in the Peeron database containing (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: Plans to include LCAD or TLG part numbers on inventroy entries?
|
|
(...) That's already being done in many cases. (...) Go for it. Use the parts tracker to avoid duplication of effort. (...) Which inventories? Partsref already links to several inventory sites. Steve (24 years ago, 9-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Plans to include LCAD or TLG part numbers on inventroy entries?
|
|
I would find this useful in that I would be able to obtain a visual appearance for more obscurly named parts. In additon it would help to idenfity gaps in the LCAD part library. (LoM has at least 5 new mouldings in the set I bought..- Will start (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: How many parts is a lever with base?
|
|
(...) So, between you and me, we have a 100% agreement on the second form ;-) As no one protested, I'll continue my inventories in the second form. Regards, Hakan (24 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: How many parts is a lever with base?
|
|
They considered as "one" piece by TLG, in assembled form. There might be two alternatives, in my opinion: Small Lever with Base Black/White or Small Lever Black Small Lever Base White and the latter is my personal choice..:-) Selçuk (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jan-01, to lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | How many parts is a lever with base?
|
|
Hi, In mosts sets, the small Lever <part:4593> and its base <part:298> come attaches to each other. How should I inventory a lever consisting of a white base and black handle? Two pieces? One piece because they come pre-assembled? Which color (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Unrecognized sets
|
|
(...) I can't help with the Lugnet database stuff, but I can definitely tell you that the abive set is *not* a fake, it is a real LEGO set. There was a series of them. Here's a link to a pic of set #14: (URL) yourself lucky, some of us would love to (...) (24 years ago, 29-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Unrecognized sets
|
|
I'm a new member, and still did not get the News posting confirmation, so I use Email. I am trying to list my sets, and could not find the following: 1. Basic set #1, Probably from 1975, seems to be the "sibling" of (URL) A McDonald's set (in (...) (24 years ago, 29-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle set rating curiosity
|
|
(...) Yes, there is always a rating of 50 given by the system as a dampener. It's virtually impossible to get all the way down to 0 or all the way up to 100, by design. --Todd (24 years ago, 23-Dec-00, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.admin.database)
|
