Subject:
|
Re: Incorrect Links on SW Sidebar
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.curators
|
Date:
|
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 14:08:37 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4028 times
|
| |
|
|
| |
The person who made the
post gets to have his say, without ever taking responsibility for himself or
his words by stepping up to the plate and honestly and intelligently
explaining himself. If people are going to make posts, they should expect
that other people are going to respond. My response was valid, and I would
like to see what comes of it, if anything.
|
I’d refer you to this post.
Essentially, Kevin said it was a joke because he knows Rob, and Rob told him it
was a joke.
What Kevin said specifically was “Once upon a time, there was a thing called a
“joke”...” and I’m not sure how you have the right to demand that he explain
himself. The explanation would be, presumably, ‘I said it was a joke because it
was a joke.’ Is there need for explanation beyond this?
I get the feeling you are responding to Kevin’s sometimes caustic posts
elsewhere and his failure (?) to explain this. I don’t think it is necessarily
required here to call him out on this - why not find the posts that have
bothered you in the past and call him out on those?
-Lenny
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Incorrect Links on SW Sidebar
|
| (...) Yes. The point is, Rob's post was not a joke, but rather contained joking language to make two distinct points: (1.) that he didn't know ACPin's name, and that (2.) that he thought ACPin's website could use some redesigning. My point of (...) (19 years ago, 18-Jan-05, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.admin.curators, FTX)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
