|
| |
|  
frequency
(score: 0.571)
|
|
 | | Manhattan Bridge
|
| I recently completed this model: (URL) 12 feet long, 21,000 pieces, 35 hours build time. Full gallery post mod. (URL) enjoy! (13 years ago, 27-Oct-11, to lugnet.announce.moc) !
| |
|
post
(score: 0.571)
|
|
| | Re: Error in Hash Database again?
|
| (...) Indeed it does, and perhaps that is what it was. But I could swear I saw the very post that was mixed in there long long ago (on the 10th) and then it reappeared out of order. But it could have been a dup that got stuck somewhere and just now (...) (24 years ago, 12-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
post, frequency
(score: 0.571)
|
|
| |
|
post
(score: 0.571)
|
|
| |
|
post
(score: 0.571)
|
|
| | Re: IR Sensitivity - Was: 1.5/2.0 infrared problem
|
| (...) Mine have been apart more often than I'd like, too! :-) (...) My guess would be mostly for increased communication speed. With the higher baud rate, the duration of the 2-byte Spybot/Manas packets is halved. This allows for fewer collisions (...) (21 years ago, 26-Oct-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
|
frequency
(score: 0.570)
|
|
| | Another Outage?
|
| Did we apparently have another outage just now? No response from the server for a block of time, and when it responded, the newest post was 58 min old... It could be a perception thing but the outages seem to be increasing in frequency to me. Should (...) (24 years ago, 8-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
post, frequency
(score: 0.570)
|
|
| | Re: IR Sensitivity - Was: 1.5/2.0 infrared problem
|
| (...) Hello Mark, Thanks for your answer, this will keep me from dismantling once again my RCXs ! So it seems that LEGO modified RCX2.0 to get better compatibility with Spybots/Manas. Now a question remains, why did they increased carrier frequency (...) (21 years ago, 23-Oct-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
|
frequency
(score: 0.570)
|
|
| | Recreating old sets
|
| Hi all It is funny to think, that as a child there were only a few sets I did not get in certain series which I collected. Now, here they (almost) are: (URL) choose to collect the parts from BL and build the sets rather than buy them ready. It is (...) (13 years ago, 2-Oct-11, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.trains, lugnet.town)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.569)
|
|
| | Re: I'm bringing sexy back
|
| (...) Hi Rob, I often visit Lugnet Trains, and as you also know, there are a lot of AFOL clubs around the world all having there own website and eventually other websites where trains are discussed in their own language. see: (URL) But to please you (...) (13 years ago, 17-Sep-11, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.568)
|
|
| | Not getting authentication e-mails
|
| Is there a problem with authentication e-mails? I've posted two messages via NNTP yesterday and not yet received an authentication e-mail, plus I submitted a multiple post authentication request from the web site and have not yet received that (...) (13 years ago, 29-Sep-11, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.568)
|
|
| | since the fun has returned to Lugnet.Trains...
|
| I figured that I'd post a very large picture here since they are not allowed to be posted on a lego forum that I will not mention... (URL) Did I mention how much I enjoy the new red Cargo Train? The ascetic look of the train is very good. Its (...) (13 years ago, 21-Sep-11, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.568)
|
|
| |
|
post
(score: 0.568)
|
|
| |
|
post
(score: 0.568)
|
|
| | Re: Fishing for traffic?
|
| (...) If no one is there to hear the glass brake, does it make a sound? ;) Yeah I know that was a H U G E stone in the glass house, as we say. :D But I tried to do it the nice way and hand over the curatorship to somebody for years without success. (...) (13 years ago, 23-Sep-11, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.568)
|
|
| | Re: 'Cause it's just sad....
|
| (...) Quick! Someone build a model of that church and post it to LUGNET so the site won't die! ;-) It's funny, but 9/11 makes me think about LUGNET because I remember using it then... that's what brought me here today. But it made me happy to see (...) (13 years ago, 11-Sep-11, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto) !
| |
|
post
(score: 0.567)
|
|
| |
|
post
(score: 0.567)
|
|
| | Fishing for traffic?
|
| (...) I tell you, you are jumping into conclusiones. "Fishing for traffic from EB" - LOL! C'mon seriously, is that what you really believe? You must mean something like: "SweLUG is dead. Long live SweBrick.se! SweLUG is dead. Long live SweBrick.se! (...) (13 years ago, 16-Sep-11, to lugnet.cad.dat.models, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.567)
|
|
| | Re: Datsville Rev039 - Micro Update
|
| (...) I have some time on hand that I plan to spend on Datsville. Mainly some organizational things and a few tweaks. I will use your revision as a basis. I think it would be cool to solicit submissions from users of LDD as well as LDraw, for (...) (13 years ago, 8-Sep-11, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.566)
|
|
| |
|
frequency
(score: 0.565)
|
