Subject:
|
Re: Error in Hash Database again?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 12 Dec 2000 02:55:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
397 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Scott Arthur writes:
>
> I think this can happen when a post sits in the sender's outbox (perhaps
> because they are offline) for a while before it is posted - I am pretty sure
> it is listed by sent date, but the age is based on when it reaches LUGNET.
>
> Does that make sense?
Indeed it does, and perhaps that is what it was. But I could swear I saw the
very post that was mixed in there long long ago (on the 10th) and then it
reappeared out of order. But it could have been a dup that got stuck
somewhere and just now made it...
SOMETHING is screwy though. And as I said last time, the frequency of
incidents seems to be on the increase and it worries me. Maybe needlessly.
It's in my circle of concern but outside my circle of influence so Covey
suggests not to let it worry me but it does.
++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Error in Hash Database again?
|
| (...) well, since the error was a non-fatal one (if I recall correctly) the message will not bounce right away, but will try to resend for a while... If sendmail was refusing connections for, say, 4 hours, some messages might be delayed up to 8 (...) (24 years ago, 12-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Error in Hash Database again?
|
| (...) I think this can happen when a post sits in the sender's outbox (perhaps because they are offline) for a while before it is posted - I am pretty sure it is listed by sent date, but the age is based on when it reaches LUGNET. Does that make (...) (24 years ago, 11-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
