Subject:
|
Re: Error in Hash Database again?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 11 Dec 2000 15:50:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
418 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Jude Beaudin writes:
> > Todd,
> >
> > Is this why there are posts from Dec 8th mixed in with today's posts?
>
> I was just popping over here to report that!
>
> http://news.lugnet.com/?n=*198969,-20&v=b
>
> for example, is currently showing this post as 21 minutes old
> http://news.lugnet.com/loc/uk/?n=5263
>
> and the very next post in its list is shown as 24 minutes old
> http://news.lugnet.com/org/us/wamalug/?n=654
>
> yet is from yesterday...
I think this can happen when a post sits in the sender's outbox (perhaps
because they are offline) for a while before it is posted - I am pretty sure
it is listed by sent date, but the age is based on when it reaches LUGNET.
Does that make sense?
Scott A
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Error in Hash Database again?
|
| (...) Indeed it does, and perhaps that is what it was. But I could swear I saw the very post that was mixed in there long long ago (on the 10th) and then it reappeared out of order. But it could have been a dup that got stuck somewhere and just now (...) (24 years ago, 12-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Error in Hash Database again?
|
| (...) I was just popping over here to report that! (URL) example, is currently showing this post as 21 minutes old (URL) the very next post in its list is shown as 24 minutes old (URL) is from yesterday... (24 years ago, 11-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
