Subject:
|
Re: Error in Hash Database again?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 12 Dec 2000 03:15:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
666 times
|
| |
|
|
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 02:55:44AM +0000, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> Indeed it does, and perhaps that is what it was. But I could swear I saw the
> very post that was mixed in there long long ago (on the 10th) and then it
> reappeared out of order. But it could have been a dup that got stuck
> somewhere and just now made it...
well, since the error was a non-fatal one (if I recall correctly) the
message will not bounce right away, but will try to resend for a while...
If sendmail was refusing connections for, say, 4 hours, some messages might
be delayed up to 8 hours (with the default settings) before getting
through. while messages sent right after the problem was fixed will get
through right away.
> SOMETHING is screwy though. And as I said last time, the frequency of
> incidents seems to be on the increase and it worries me. Maybe needlessly.
perhaps if lugnet had a secondary MX record, at least the mail will never
bounce... Looking up in DNS, I noticed there is none. Todd - if you're
interested, I could host a secondary, forwarding MX on one of our exodus
servers... that should be fairly reliable... Just let me know :)
--
Dan Boger / dan@peeron.com / www.peeron.com / ICQ: 1130750
<set:1886_1>: Star Wars Bucket (LEGO/SYSTEM/Star Wars/Unreleased), '99, Unknown figs
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Error in Hash Database again?
|
| (...) Indeed it does, and perhaps that is what it was. But I could swear I saw the very post that was mixed in there long long ago (on the 10th) and then it reappeared out of order. But it could have been a dup that got stuck somewhere and just now (...) (24 years ago, 12-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
