Results 341 – 360 of about 37000.
|
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.
|
|
| |
|  
post
(score: 0.543)
|
|
| |
|
post
(score: 0.543)
|
|
| |
|
post
(score: 0.543)
|
|
| |
|
post
(score: 0.542)
|
|
 | | Re: Vision command + linux
|
| (...) My son is into adding 3D graphics to video footage to create short movies with stuff like flying saucers attacking our car. (URL) out the "Making of" link up at the top somewhere). To do that, we needed figure out where to draw the 3D (...) (23 years ago, 12-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
frequency
(score: 0.542)
|
|
| |
|
post
(score: 0.542)
|
|
| |
|
post
(score: 0.542)
|
|
| |
|
post
(score: 0.541)
|
|
| |
|
post, frequency
(score: 0.541)
|
|
| |
|
post, frequency
(score: 0.541)
|
|
| | Re: Posting frequency?
|
| Shiri Dori <shirid@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:G6Grs5.8u0@lugnet.com... (...) Yup, I kinda figured the debaters would make the top, followed by the rest of us. You're more of a loudmouth than I, but you've been hampered by being in school as (...) (26 years ago, 1-Jan-01, to lugnet.people)
| |
|
post, frequency
(score: 0.541)
|
|
| |
|
post, frequency
(score: 0.541)
|
|
| |
|
post, frequency
(score: 0.541)
|
|
| | Re: Robolab, byte codes and assembler
|
| (...) Should be legal, perhaps. But I was just suggesting that before sending him off to try to patch the firmware, he might want to make sure it was legal to do so. Although RIS and RoboLab may not use the same identical firmware, that doesn't (...) (23 years ago, 29-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
| |
|
frequency
(score: 0.540)
|
|
| | Re: Ultrasonic proximity sensor
|
| (...) The frequency at which air is best matched is about 40kHz, several things with this: - low resolution because of the low frequency - going to take more power to get a given range of detection than using a commercial grade unit (works at 40kHz) (...) (23 years ago, 20-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
frequency
(score: 0.540)
|
|
| | Re: Robolab, byte codes and assembler
|
| Thanks for the response. (...) It seems to me it's a design flaw in the entire method of counting rotations, which relies on the theoretical ideal of "instantaneous" voltage changes, which can't be produced. You can't go from 2V to 5V without (...) (23 years ago, 27-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
| |
|
frequency
(score: 0.540)
|
|
| | Re: Robolab, byte codes and assembler
|
| (...) Yes, I did read your information. It was very helpful - the best stuff I found on the subject. But as you said, modifying the sensor would probably disqualify. But, that does make me think again about the recent unavailability of the part . . (...) (23 years ago, 27-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
| |
|
frequency
(score: 0.540)
|
|
| | Robolab, byte codes and assembler
|
| Having investigated rotations sensors thoroughly, I conclude they have some serious design flaws. Most notably, some samples taken during voltage transitions can be impossible to differentiate from samples at entirely different rotational positions. (...) (23 years ago, 26-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
| |
|
frequency
(score: 0.540)
|
|
| | Re: Trains, DCC, and pbForth
|
| (...) The basic DCC ack is defined as an increase of load on the track of at least 60ma for 6ms +/- 1ms. Normally this happens on a quiet track where all you have powered is the decoder being programmed at the time. However, if you have a bunch or (...) (23 years ago, 21-Nov-03, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| |
|
frequency
(score: 0.539)
|
|
| | Re: The pulse is getting weak again.
|
| (...) I check Lugnet every day, but seldom post. GMLTC is pretty lousy at promoting ourselves, even though there are lots of things happening in/around/above/below our layout. We've got new trains running, a few 'in progress', and other fun stuff. (...) (15 years ago, 1-Dec-11, to lugnet.trains)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.539)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
