Subject:
|
Re: Posting frequency?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.people
|
Date:
|
Mon, 1 Jan 2001 03:46:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5326 times
|
| |
|
|
Shiri Dori <shirid@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:G6Grs5.8u0@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.people, Tim Courtney writes:
> > About a year ago or more, Todd posted a list of peoples' names and ranked how
> > often they posted to Lugnet. Just out of curiosity, Todd, could you generate
> > one of those again? I think it would be neat to compare to the old one and • also
> > to see who the loudmouths are now ;-)
>
> <grin>
>
> Tim, you and I would probably be way up there. ;-) And if o-t.debate is
> counted, we'd probably be 3rd and 4th places (right after Scott and Larry of
> course!!)
Yup, I kinda figured the debaters would make the top, followed by the rest of
us. You're more of a loudmouth than I, but you've been hampered by being in
school as well. My schedule is a lot more free. :P
I get occasional emails for help with Lugnet just because the person has 'seen
me post there a lot.' If that isn't telling me something...
> (Actually I would probably only be way up there for early 2000, til about
> July... after that I neglected lugnet a bit. But I'm still a blabbermouth.
> And I'll shush now. ;-)
Do you know the meaning of the word shush? <gdr>
> -Shiri
>
> P.S. Tim-my boy, you misspelled curiousity...
Ever since I stopped having spelling tests at the end of Jr High, my spelling
has declined. I've even un-learned how to spell certain words -- strange, and
scary at that. Thank God for the little jagged red underlines in MS Word ;-)
-Tim
(who is hopefully off to Brandon's soon)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Posting frequency?
|
| "Tim Courtney" <tim@zacktron.com> wrote in message news:G6Gt1I.482@lugnet.com... <snip> (...) 'seen (...) <snip> Tim was referring to me. :) Anyhoo he did help even if I did figure it out myself :) HAPPY NEW YEAR!!! -- Kenneth A. Drumm Ph.D.who's (...) (24 years ago, 1-Jan-01, to lugnet.people)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Posting frequency?
|
| (...) <grin> Tim, you and I would probably be way up there. ;-) And if o-t.debate is counted, we'd probably be 3rd and 4th places (right after Scott and Larry of course!!) (Actually I would probably only be way up there for early 2000, til about (...) (24 years ago, 1-Jan-01, to lugnet.people)
|
114 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
