LUGNET News : Search Results: pieniazek


Search Results: pieniazek

Results 721 – 740 of about 16000.

Search took 0.00 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: One comment
(...) Ya know... What really would be good would be if Kevin got in the habit of giving proper context in his quotes (of me, of you, of whoever), instead of quoting for effect. With your permission, Chris, I'll share the whole chatlog of our (...) (19 years ago, 23-Apr-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

pieniazek
(score: 0.352)

		Re: LUGNET members association
(...) ? Sorry, could you clarify that? Every reviewing action lately has been seen, there haven't been any non public timeouts given in quite a while. (...) ? Can you clarify that? I see no signs of that! (19 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)

pieniazek
(score: 0.352)

		Re: LUGNET members association
(...) PS, that's just the sort of "picking at every word" (questioning "endless" when you know what was meant) that deters participation. (19 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)

pieniazek
(score: 0.352)

		Re: LUGNET members association
(...) Sorry, that was rhetoric. LUGNET is not infinite so there never has been an "endless" one. But there have been lots of interminable ones, don't you agree? (...) For a "made up" example The decision would be "person A gets a timeout of 48 hours (...) (19 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)

pieniazek
(score: 0.352)

		Re: LUGNET members association
(...) I was referring to the whole thing. What specifically do you disagree with? This is an important point that bears repeating: " endless debate (about specific reviewing actions) has proven (in many many other places, not just here) not to be (...) (19 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)

pieniazek
(score: 0.352)

		Re: LUGNET members association
(...) Let's clarify what's meant when that sort of thing is said. (and what was omitted when it was said) This is, at some level, a governance question (governance in the general sense of "how things are organised") It's important to distinguish (...) (19 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)

pieniazek
(score: 0.352)

		Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
(...) I'll say this, I'm still hopeful that the LPRV will pick up where it left off and get back to work. Maybe now it can. I owe the LPRV a significant sized post with answers to the questions that were asked about various technical and intention (...) (19 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)

pieniazek
(score: 0.352)

		LDD "hackers" made CNET
(URL) For those of you following the efforts of LDD users in streamlining the bag use in LDD, CNET published a cool article about it, and LEGO's reaction to their work. Quoted are Dan Malec, Larry Pieniazek, and Jake McKee (among others). I find it (...) (19 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.cad, lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)

pieniazek
(score: 0.352)

		Re: NELUG Announcement
I'm not sure congratulations are in order (congratulating on adding structure?) but I'll offer them anyway because it feels like you've achieved a very significant milestone. It's clear that a lot of thought went into this. When you contrast it with (...) (19 years ago, 18-Apr-05, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)

pieniazek
(score: 0.352)

		Re: Question on Train Wheel Diameter, Minifig Scale
(...) The prototype measures from the inside edge, IIRC since rail cross sectional dimensions vary. I agree that the wheels are under-diameter in relation to track gauge (Working some US numbers: a typical US non low profile freight car wheel might (...) (19 years ago, 18-Apr-05, to lugnet.trains)

pieniazek
(score: 0.352)

		Re: Application for Lugnet Membership
(...) Todd. (19 years ago, 18-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)

pieniazek
(score: 0.352)

		Re: New Poll: Did you complete the TLC questionaire?
(...) Totally agree. But I think John was trying to measure whether "we made it or not" ... per Jake's "holy mackerel!" post, I'd say "easily"... (which is awesome!) (19 years ago, 16-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)

pieniazek
(score: 0.352)

		Re: Announcing BrickFest 2005
(...) Your stuff? I heard it it got horribly changed in a freak Dremel accident. These sorts of requests might be better handled offline, not sure. XFUT off-topic.fun (19 years ago, 16-Apr-05, to lugnet.events.brickfest, lugnet.off-topic.fun)

pieniazek
(score: 0.352)

		Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
In lugnet.general, Shaun Sullivan wrote: (snip) I've went through this whole thread tree up to as of just now, and added everything that I thought looked like a suggestion to our (URL) list>. If you think you made a suggestion in this thread or (...) (19 years ago, 15-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)

pieniazek
(score: 0.352)

		Re: New Poll: Did you complete the TLC questionaire?
(...) LOL, I was just thinking the same thing. EVERYONE seems to forget that one sometimes. Even you, I expect, as I know I do. (...) Isn't that pretty much true of ALL polls on LUGNET? Is there a suggestion in there somewhere? If so, you know where (...) (19 years ago, 15-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)

pieniazek
(score: 0.352)

		Re: Lego company survey now on LegoFan.org
(...) (snip) (...) I took this, you can get to it from the (URL) LegoFan> page as well. I had to use IE to take the survey, it didn't work for me in FireFox. YMMV. I found it took about 15-20 min or so to take, you will be asked a number of (...) (19 years ago, 15-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)

pieniazek
(score: 0.352)

		Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
(...) I'm a paying member, didn't realise you were not. (I figured the people raising functionality concerns were paying members)... I'll try to try to remember to try it tonite. I forget where we should talk about BrickShelf functionality... prolly (...) (19 years ago, 13-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)

pieniazek
(score: 0.352)

		Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
(...) Hmm, that suggests a test... what happens if you're logged in? Logging in suppresses ads I thought, so MAYBE suppresses shuffle too? (...) Nod. I expect that's a common feeling. (19 years ago, 13-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)

pieniazek
(score: 0.352)

		Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
(...) Um, I encourage people to spotlight posts every chance I get... (...) Adjusting spotlight weights isn't changing the whole scheme, though, is it? Spotlight weights have been around for a very long time and they get periodically adjusted. (...) (...) (19 years ago, 13-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)

pieniazek
(score: 0.351)

		Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
(...) Point taken. There are a number of issues that LUGNET is struggling with, but this certainly is one of them. (...) Left that dangling... I agree that it doesn't. Personally I think it might be desireable to not consider posts that didn't get (...) (19 years ago, 13-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)

pieniazek
(score: 0.351)

More: Next Page >>