To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
  Search Results: pieniazek
 Results 3921 – 3940 of about 16000.
Search took 0.00 CPU seconds. 

Messages:  Full | Brief | Compact
Sort:  Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

  Re: And now for something completely different...
 
(...) Lets try to go all the way back to the beginning. Dave K started a thread asking a hypothetical about whether a person would want to know if an asteroid was coming. Some people responded to that question but mostly we've got off track. We're (...) (22 years ago, 12-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.277)

  Re: ISCC winners
 
(...) My bad, I haven't told René who won the Milton Train Works(tm) special prize... because I haven't decided yet! Hard to decide, there's a lot of good vignettes. (22 years ago, 11-Mar-03, to lugnet.general)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.277)

  Re: How to Run a Double-Elimination Match
 
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Jeff Elliott writes: a great explanation of single and especially double elimination which I snipped but which I have to try to remember since I'll be running something at GenCon Indy ... (...) This is often used for (...) (22 years ago, 11-Mar-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.277)

  Re: Announcing BrickFest 2003!
 
(...) I'm with Chris on this, "no Karaoke" will make it a better event. Dan Jassim rocked, man(1), but on balance (*cough* John Neal *cough) we're better off without it, thanks 1 - or was that "rocket man"? ++Lar (22 years ago, 11-Mar-03, to lugnet.events.brickfest)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.277)

  Re: And now for something completely different...
 
(...) No. You asked me what research *you* should have done. I gave you a search string you could use if you like. It doesn't matter to me whether you use it or not. (22 years ago, 11-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.277)

  Re: And now for something completely different...
 
(...) Note that neither of these statements dismiss the conclusion. They merely deride the source. (22 years ago, 10-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.277)

  Re: USS Duluth - Hull design innovation!
 
(...) Nothing. I just happen to work at minifig scale (and a 20K TEU ship at that scale would truly be "really large") (22 years ago, 10-Mar-03, to lugnet.build.military)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.277)

  Proposed meeting for this Wednesday, 12 March, 2003
 
We had talked of a 12 March meeting. Regrettably I won't be able to be there as I am not going to be in Harrisburg this week, due to a shift in plans with the project. It's too early to say more than that. But I encourage everyone to meet anyway, (...) (22 years ago, 10-Mar-03, to lugnet.loc.us.pa.phi.har)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.277)

  Re: USS Duluth - Hull design innovation!
 
(...) Many container ships and tankers and suchlike are completely vertical, in fact when one looks down they look like rectangles with bows and sterns tacked on, it's not till well under the water line that you get curving inward to the keel. But (...) (22 years ago, 10-Mar-03, to lugnet.build.military)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.277)

  Re: USS Duluth - Hull design innovation!
 
(...) WOW! That is cool! I am suspecting that this technique won't work well for cargo ships, or other hulls that have a lot of bow curvature but for cruisers and destroyers which knife through the water it works really well. Bravo for discovering (...) (22 years ago, 8-Mar-03, to lugnet.build.military)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.277)

  Re: W
 
(...) I don't think you have clearance for that. He only speaks when he's in Undisclosed Locations.... (22 years ago, 7-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.277)

  Re: And now for something completely different...
 
(...) We are alike in kind, my friend, as far as digression goes. We differ only in degree. My digressions are short, while yours... what was it J2 said? "novella" I believe. Oh, and by the way, when I said I was going to let you have last word on (...) (22 years ago, 7-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.277)

  Re: And now for something completely different...
 
(...) Just to make sure we're clear here. Are you saying it would have been better had no one ever discovered North America? Are you saying that you'd rather that the western hemisphere forever remained the domain of its then current inhabitants? (...) (22 years ago, 7-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.277)

  Re: And now for something completely different...
 
(...) No. If two sources come to the same conclusion about something and one is biased and unworthy of further consideration that does not so tar the other source. (...) But I am not, in fact arguing that at all. I'm arguing for private exploitation (...) (22 years ago, 7-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.277)

  Re: Religious bigotry = Patriotism, say State Representatives
 
(...) Here's another take that makes it even more dubious that this guy (a judge?) has much justification for complaining. (URL) (scroll down to "Birth of an Urban Legend" and I can't say how long this cite will work)... -start- Birth of an Urban (...) (22 years ago, 7-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.277)

  Re: And now for something completely different...
 
(...) It certainly does. I think less of that particular source each time I see it cited. He has no idea what he's talking about in this case, and his collection of assertions is just that, a collection of assertions with bias (but no cites) behind (...) (22 years ago, 7-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.277)

  Re: And now for something completely different...
 
(...) Try this search string at Google: "moonbase cost estimates" The Artemis project may be all wet, but given the several orders of magnitude difference in their estimates (using commercial grade assumptions) from NASA's, maybe these numbers of (...) (22 years ago, 7-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.277)

  Re: 1st LSC: Call for Nominations
 
(...) Yeah, the compartmentalized among us were asking I post LSC stuff in cad.dev.org.ldraw :-) (...) Consider it withdrawn. My mistake for not thinking ahead :-) I'd like to add a nomination for Larry Pieniazek - he was also involved in sorta the (...) (21 years ago, 3-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.277)

  Re: Designers Sets Now Available from SAH
 
(...) GREAT price points, much better than I had feared. Perhaps since these sets require no new molds and no licensing, some of the cost savings has been passed on to us. I hope these are huge sellers. I will be doing my bit, you can be sure. (22 years ago, 6-Mar-03, to lugnet.lego.direct)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.277)

  Re: End-of-Line Ddevice, switch point MOCs
 
(...) If you have an RCX 1.0, it's quite a bit simpler just to power the track directly from the RCX output itself, as long as you don't have too many motors, rather than having the RCX control a device that controls the speed reg. However that (...) (22 years ago, 6-Mar-03, to lugnet.trains)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.277)

More:  Next Page >>


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR