Results 3281 3300 of about 86000.
|
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.
|
|
|
| how, link (score: 2.020) |
|
| | Make me laugh. Come on, I dare you sll!
|
| Mwahahahaha! Tomorrow will be April 1st and last time I checked, there's all these pranksters that will be trying to catch us with a nice announcement about how LEGO is going to reintroduce the monorail sets or the classic grays... However, I'll mis (...) (20 years ago, 1-Apr-05, to lugnet.general)
| |
| how, link (score: 2.020) |
|
|
| how, link (score: 2.020) |
|
| | Re: Crawler Treads
|
| Yes, one question is how would we convince TLG to keep the treads themselves in production for more than six months? It seems to me that of late really good and rare pieces like Technic Link Tread have been too far and few between set designs, at (...) (20 years ago, 6-Apr-05, to lugnet.technic)
| |
| how, link (score: 2.020) |
|
|
| how, deep (score: 2.018) |
|
|
| how, deep (score: 2.018) |
|
| | Re: Keppler Industries Update: F-111 Trencher
|
| I hate you, Kyle. A simple post brimming with attitude("Click it, duh!") and I'm thinking; "Oh boy, here comes another Mr. Haughty-who-thinks-h...ace-stuff" and when I click on the link (duh!) and look at the picture, IT'S ALL TRUE! Crush you and (...) (20 years ago, 8-Apr-05, to lugnet.space)
| |
| how, link (score: 2.018) |
|
| | Re: My First MOC
|
| As promised, here is a link for Brickshelf. There is a movie there too, but the lighting wasn't great (it was raining, and I was in my basement) so apologies. The robot tips in the movie because the floor it was on was slanted due to the drain in (...) (20 years ago, 12-Apr-05, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic, FTX)
| |
| how, link (score: 2.018) |
|
|
| how, link (score: 2.017) |
|
| | Re: One comment
|
| Larry Pieniazek wrote: >> Say the word, and I'll post a link. > Go ahead, please do post the whole thing. I have the same log you do, so if you > edited it, it would be pretty obvious there was a discrepancy, wouldn't it? > Also please remember that (...) (20 years ago, 23-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| how, link (score: 2.016) |
|
| | NELUG Announcement
|
| F O R E W O R D This is a lengthy email, but please take the time to read it as it covers a number of changes that will be occurring within NELUG in the immediate future. I N T R O D U C T I O N NELUG has certainly grown since it started in 1999. (...) (20 years ago, 18-Apr-05, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.org.us.nelug) !!
| |
| how, link (score: 2.016) |
|
| | Re: Outside traffic [was: Another resignation]
|
| (...) Instead of a number of top-level, one-ng trees, how about clustering these feeds under a single 'external sources' group. Something like lugnet.external-feed...sic-space? Or lugnet.loc.external....ass-space? (...) I'm not sure about pulling a (...) (20 years ago, 19-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| how, link (score: 2.016) |
|
| | Re: Holy Mackerel! LEGO survey...
|
| Jake McKee wrote: > > Thanks so much everyone for showing that the AFOLs are a force to be reckoned > with! > > * Would you buy LEGO toys for children 0-11? Y/N Yes. > * Why / Why not? > Lego is a toy range that gains value with every set you buy, (...) (20 years ago, 18-Apr-05, to lugnet.lego)
| |
| how, link (score: 2.015) |
|
| | Sugestions
|
| Well after reading some of last nights highlights I felt I just had to post something. Kevin Clagues witty post has forced me to at least say something about the condition here on Lugnet. The truth is that these issues are destroying us. Imho the (...) (20 years ago, 20-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| |
| how, link (score: 2.015) |
|
| | Re: Holy Mackerel! LEGO survey...
|
| In lugnet.general, Jake McKee wrote: (Bon Snippage) (...) I already do, because LEGO toys can be anything a child can imagine; they drive kids to be creative, and can be used over and over in many different ways. And as a child grows, and can use (...) (20 years ago, 19-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
| |
| how, link (score: 2.015) |
|
| | Re: One comment
|
| (...) Deal. in fact. I was looking for a way to ask you; how you would feel about me posting the ~ENTIRE~ convo. lets clear the air. lets start this transparency thing by STOPPING the "he said she said" nonsense. too many times, the game of "broken (...) (20 years ago, 23-Apr-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| |
| how, link (score: 2.015) |
|
| | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
|
| (...) I think this is a fantastic discussion-- one that we started on the list, but (as I've said on the list) I *REALLY* want admin feedback like this from admins on a continual basis. Seriously, this is the most effectual I've felt yet about the (...) (20 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| how, link (score: 2.015) |
|
| | Re: One comment
|
| (...) Go ahead, please do post the whole thing. I have the same log you do, so if you edited it, it would be pretty obvious there was a discrepancy, wouldn't it? Also please remember that you would need to warn that it may contain material that some (...) (20 years ago, 23-Apr-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| how, link (score: 2.014) |
|
| | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
|
| (...) I'm not going to reply in detail (although there is stuff I agree with and stuff I disagree with...) Instead, I'm going to ask you how *you* would handle a particular post, as an exercise. (URL) a post that flogs. There is nothing in that post (...) (20 years ago, 23-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| how, link (score: 2.014) |
|
| | Re: One comment
|
| (...) What we consider profane differs, I guess. But it's not that big a deal. I just wanted to make sure that no one could say you posted a link to something objectionable without warning about it, that's all. (recall that you asked about that very (...) (20 years ago, 23-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| how, link (score: 2.014) | More: Next Page >>
|