|
| |
|  
set, followup
(score: 3.311)
|
|
| |
|
set, followup
(score: 3.311)
|
|
| |
|
set, followup
(score: 3.311)
|
|
 | | Re: 8250 Search Sub
|
| (...) Steve -- Thanks for your feedback! I'm not sure this reply should be in db.inv, so I'm entering lugnet.general in my "followup-to" field. To answer your comment: My color column lined up just fine when I entered the message. Unfortunately, (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jul-99, to lugnet.db.inv)
| |
|
set, followup
(score: 3.311)
|
|
| | Re: New group suggestion
|
| (...) Hmm, the rationale being what? (Not disagreeing, just unclear on the motivation behind it.) To increase (encourage) more FOTW posts? To make FOTW's easier to find? To make FOTW's come and find you (by subscribing to the group via e-mail?) I'm (...) (25 years ago, 21-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
set, followup
(score: 3.311)
|
|
| | Re: lugnet.cad hierarhcy
|
| (...) Welp, it feels nice to move around in, but it SURE feels disjointed from the rest of the CAD stuff, which makes it no fun at all in the final analysis. Cross-linkages could repair some of that, but that's just a band-aid, and it would just (...) (25 years ago, 24-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
set, followup
(score: 3.311)
|
|
| | August Surprise...
|
| While we waited... more foilage IS on the list for production, LD is aware "do you look at what people buy on eBay? (asked as a followup)" Yes. It's not a totally accurate factor... does 1 person buying 6 cypress for 110 mean that there is a huge (...) (23 years ago, 14-Jul-01, to lugnet.events.brickfest) !!
| |
|
set, followup
(score: 3.311)
|
|
| |
|
outlook, set
(score: 3.311)
|
|
| | Re: Ya wanna talk about legislating morality?
|
| (...) Let's throw out the term "Creation" in this context, because it stacks the deck in favor your argument. Additionally, we've previously discussed the imprecision of term "Science" with a capital-S, so can we refer instead to science? The (...) (19 years ago, 6-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
outlook, set
(score: 3.311)
|
|
| | Re: Uselessness of .debate
|
| (...) I agree, I'd be sad to see it go. But what I'm really sad is that as far as I'm concerned, it's gone now. A year ago I really enjoyed .debate. The past few months, the time for a thread to deteriorate into one of the two recurring shouting (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
outlook, set
(score: 3.311)
|
|
| | mi presento
|
| Ciao a tutti Mi presento: sono Gigi Martinelli, ho 43 anni e sono il papa' di tre bambini (14, 8, 7) che da alcuni anni mi forniscono un valido alibi per poter giocare ancora con il mio giocattolo preferito, ovviamente la Lego... ;-). Da poco tempo (...) (24 years ago, 30-Nov-00, to lugnet.loc.it)
| |
|
outlook, set
(score: 3.311)
|
|
| | Re: Star Wars Episode 1 Video Tape
|
| (...) Actually it did not map on my Windows '95 machine at work. I will have to try it on my '98 machine at home to see if it is built into the character set there. As a side note I work developing software for IBM and being a global company (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.starwars)
| |
|
set, followup
(score: 3.311)
|
|
| | Re: New legend is up
|
| First let me say that I would like to see some smaller sets rereleased as well as large ones. Sets the size of Guarded Inn, Pizza to Go, etc are the backbone of the line and sell in larger quantities as new sets. So I have no argument with the (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jul-02, to lugnet.general)
| |
|
outlook, set
(score: 3.310)
|
|
| | Re: How did you come out of your Dark Ages?
|
| (...) My dark ages started sometime around '88. I was 12, and as I recall, some of my friends were telling me I was a little immature to have bunches of Lego still lying around. Of course I always told them I never played with them, being the brave (...) (24 years ago, 25-Nov-00, to lugnet.people)
| |
|
outlook, set
(score: 3.310)
|
|
| | Charter for lugnet.announce.lsahs
|
| (...) Allrighty then, I count four people (Gary L, Ben G, Tom McD, and me) who are in favor of the name being lugnet.announce.lsahs and no one yet directly opposed to that specific name. Linc S listed some other possibilities (...) (26 years ago, 17-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
set, followup
(score: 3.310)
|
|
| |
|
express, set
(score: 3.310)
|
|
| | Re: gay by birth vs. gay by choice
|
| (...) It is neither here nor there. If there is a gay gene, I don't see what the Bible has to do with it. That is a problem for the literalists to wrestle with. (...) No, not at all, except that you seem to interpret the possiblity of a gay gene (...) (23 years ago, 4-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
outlook, set
(score: 3.310)
|
|
| | Re: visit transy-lego-vania!
|
| (...) "Too bad about the cookies"? I've yet to _ever_ see anyone do anything malicious with cookies. There is a security model in place which prevents most possible misuse. (Some places, like double-click, kind of sneak around the security model, (...) (25 years ago, 26-Sep-99, to lugnet.castle)
| |
|
set, followup
(score: 3.310)
|
|
| | Re: lugnet.cad hierarhcy
|
| Hmm. It may take a while for me to warm up to this setup. I actually like having the discussion of models/parts separate from the cad.dat group. When I hear people raving about a model I might find interesting, then I'm motivated to check it out on (...) (25 years ago, 14-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
set, followup
(score: 3.310)
|
|
| | Re: lugnet.dev.null or somesuch
|
| (...) Than a trashbin? Well, quite a bit different I would hope, at least the participants would like to think so. What are you trying to say here? (...) I'm net savvy and I forget somewhere between 10 and 25 percent of the time. Setting followups (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
set, followup
(score: 3.310)
|
