|
| |
|  
legends
(score: 1.831)
|
|
| |
|
legends
(score: 1.831)
|
|
| |
|
legends
(score: 1.831)
|
|
 | | Re: Urban legends and Sluggy
|
| (...) :-D I spent the better part of a week in my office catching up a few months back -- evidently I could be heard hooting occasionally. It must've been the caffeine... (...) It's all I can do to add to add to Pete Abram's ad revenue. He still (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jun-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| |
|
legends
(score: 1.831)
|
|
| | Re: Urban legends and Sluggy
|
| (...) Hehe... well I'm still catching up, but once I get to the current storyline I'll see if I can get it. ;-) -Shiri (who's already in early 2000 comics... not much more to go) (24 years ago, 5-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| |
|
legends
(score: 1.831)
|
|
| |
|
legends
(score: 1.831)
|
|
| | Re: Urban legends and Sluggy
|
| (...) Whoops. I dashed that off then went on vacation. (...) Erm, okay, it explains *EVERYTHING* as in, "Where is Kitzke (NO VOWELS!) now?", or "Why do people always die so ludicrously in these schlocky movies?" or "Why couldn't I find my keys this (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| |
|
legends
(score: 1.831)
|
|
| | Re: Urban legends and Sluggy
|
| (...) Of course he will... no doubt about it, man. -Shiri -- I'll be on vacation between July 15th and the end of August... please forgive slow replies to emails/posts. - Uh-oh!! How will I survive without lugnet OR sluggy... heh. ;-) (24 years ago, 10-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| |
|
legends
(score: 1.831)
|
|
| | Re: Urban legends and Sluggy
|
| (...) I'm not very Sluggish(1) yet, I just am up to Jan 98, but I'm already sensing that the Bunster can and *will* take ANYTHING, eventually. Maybe not on the first meeting, but revenge is a dish best served cold. Maybe not in a fair fight, but in (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| |
|
legends
(score: 1.831)
|
|
| | Re: Urban legends and Sluggy
|
| (...) ...Or that Bun-Bun takes *nothing*, not from anyone. ;-) (...) I love McKeegan's line from the movie _Vendetta_ -- "NOBODY likes to see innocent people hurt in the way of justice...but I guess there are worse things." Ouch. :-, (...) I dunno (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| |
|
legends
(score: 1.831)
|
|
| |
|
legends
(score: 1.831)
|
|
| |
|
legends
(score: 1.831)
|
|
| | Re: Classic legends? legendary classics?
|
| (...) I may have misunderstood what's going on with the Classic sets but I thought that they would NOT be S@H exclusives - as evidenced by the fact that they first appeared on a German retailer's website. I don't remember if there were ever any (...) (23 years ago, 8-Jun-01, to lugnet.general)
| |
|
legends
(score: 1.831)
|
|
| | Re: Classic legends? legendary classics?
|
| (...) Brad Justus said on his original post that LEGO Classics will be on German retailers: check: (URL)I understand that. But what is the real difference from the consumer's point (...) As long as they keep the old good sets coming, I don't care (...) (23 years ago, 8-Jun-01, to lugnet.general)
| |
|
legends
(score: 1.831)
|
|
| |
|
legends
(score: 1.831)
|
|
| | Re: LEGO Legends
|
| Well, highly regarded by Kiernan and I, who do that section of LEGO.com (the BUILD section) and put together that Super Car article. I would hesitate to jump to any conclusions based on our editorial choices. =) Tomas Clark tclark@halfrobot.com (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic)
| |
|
legends
(score: 1.831)
|
|
| | Re: LEGO Legends
|
| Yes, well done! I enjoyed it too. Gary #801 David Arnon <arnon@NOSPAMsilicon-value.com> wrote in message news:GEqG6K.L4n@lugnet.com... (...) (the (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic)
| |
|
legends
(score: 1.831)
|
|
| | Re: LEGO Legends
|
| (...) All these numbers are very confusing, apart from 8462 I don't know the numbers of any sets and can't be arsed to look them up. Can't people use the proper names? Steve (23 years ago, 11-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic)
| |
|
legends
(score: 1.831)
|
|
| | Re: Future Castle Legends Survey
|
| I would have to agree with you on the 6040,41 pack. I think that would be a great way to package the 2 sets and make it at least worth while. Though each set seperately would be cool too! 1680 or 1877 both basically the same set.. so take which ever (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.dear-lego)
| |
|
legends
(score: 1.831)
|
|
| | Re: LEGO Legends
|
| (...) Steve, Where's the hassle cutting & pasting a few lines into the Lugnet search window? You get a nice picture of each set (usually) which is worth 1000 words. If you "can't be arsed to look them up", why should you expect others to aid your (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic)
| |
|
legends
(score: 1.831)
|
