Subject:
|
Re: Urban legends and Sluggy
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Mon, 10 Jul 2000 19:53:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
323 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Jeremy H. Sproat writes:
> Jorge Rodriguez wrote:
> > I think Bun-bun can take Kitten.
>
> I think Bun-bun *will* take Kitten.
I'm not very Sluggish(1) yet, I just am up to Jan 98, but I'm already sensing
that the Bunster can and *will* take ANYTHING, eventually.
Maybe not on the first meeting, but revenge is a dish best served cold.
Maybe not in a fair fight, but in the Bunbook fighting fair is for losers.
Maybe not without some collateral damage to bystanders, but "you gotta problem
with that, bud?"
Am I right?
1 - as in I haven't yet figured out why it's called "Sluggy" Freelance, who or
what is Sluggy? "I see no Sluggy here", as they say.
++Lar
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Urban legends and Sluggy
|
| (...) ...Or that Bun-Bun takes *nothing*, not from anyone. ;-) (...) I love McKeegan's line from the movie _Vendetta_ -- "NOBODY likes to see innocent people hurt in the way of justice...but I guess there are worse things." Ouch. :-, (...) I dunno (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | Re: Urban legends and Sluggy
|
| That comic style reminds me of M.A.D. (TM) (C) :-) Cheers ... Geoffrey Hyde Larry Pieniazek <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:FxHz9H.6Mr@lugnet.com... (...) sensing (...) problem (...) who or (...) (24 years ago, 28-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
Message is in Reply To:
22 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
