Results 1161 – 1180 of 1516.
|
Search took 0.00 CPU seconds.
|
|
 | | Re: Rant...
|
| (...) THese new junior models are supposed to be designed for kids, correct? They are designed to make building easier for kids, right? Well, I'm a kid. And here is what I say to junior lego, IT SUCKS LIKE CRAP!!!!!!!Why can't lego design their (...) (24 years ago, 29-Oct-00, to lugnet.technic)
| |
|  
crap
(score: 0.186)
|
|
| | Brain Powered
|
| (...) John, Brain Powered Mecha...very clean lines! Not really the direction I'm headed right now but cool none the less. I'm headed into the "tons o' crap way over the top" style, but I really like the arm of the Brain Powered model. Bryce McGlone (24 years ago, 27-Oct-00, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.technic, lugnet.build.mecha)
| |
|
crap
(score: 0.186)
|
|
| | Astro Lift HA150 Heavy Artillery
|
| I just got my AuczillaXII winnings the other day [many thanks, Todd! :) ], and so I pieced together this little heavy artillery ship. It's a little fuzzy cuz I used my IXLA640 digital piece of crap. Please, comments would be appreciated. I'm trying (...) (24 years ago, 27-Oct-00, to lugnet.space)
| |
|
crap
(score: 0.186)
|
|
| |
|
crap
(score: 0.186)
|
|
| | Re: What is with the Technic Stormtrooper?
|
| (...) Lego could've made some smaller quarter spheres, in two different sizes with printing for the eyes and mouth, and laid those over the front of the Stormtrooper head... that would have given it a more "realistic look" while keeping the parts (...) (24 years ago, 27-Oct-00, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.technic)
| |
|
crap
(score: 0.186)
|
|
| | 2001 sw minifigs
|
| quickly before any jumps on me I was wrong. after looking at the pics there is a storm trooper (white) and pilot (black) under the tie fighter. Also the technic C3PO and storm trooper are crap or just look that way Aaron Coghill Kyola Department (...) (24 years ago, 26-Oct-00, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.org.au)
| |
|
crap
(score: 0.186)
|
|
| |
|
crap
(score: 0.186)
|
|
| | Re: My Stance
|
| (...) Wow, what a loaded question, especially given what seems(ed) like a reverse- witch-hunt. I'd like to state first that I realized Friday that I got WAY too worked up about this and posted some things that were, in some cases, petty and (...) (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
crap
(score: 0.185)
|
|
| |
|
crap
(score: 0.185)
|
|
| | Re: A reixamination of what happened.
|
| (...) While I would certainly agree that one person with a petty vendetta does not make a "huge conspiracy", if the idea that you were purposely out to harm the online LEGO community is "bs", how do you explain this post: (URL) seems pretty clear to (...) (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
crap
(score: 0.185)
|
|
| |
|
crap
(score: 0.185)
|
|
| |
|
crap
(score: 0.185)
|
|
| | Re: My Stance
|
| (...) Matt, You're going to take this as some kind of slam, or some kind of flame, but it's not intended as one, really. Try to keep that in mind as you read it. I've read pretty much every post resulting from your initial posts of a few days ago. I (...) (24 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
crap
(score: 0.185)
|
|
| | Re: My Stance
|
| (...) Well, theres a start. An apology is only part of the act of contrition... one must strive to be better. Regarding emotions...I generally have the emotional range of a turnip, but that does not mean I can be offensive, callous, insensitive, and (...) (24 years ago, 19-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
crap
(score: 0.185)
|
|
| | Re: A little self examination?
|
| (...) A little introspection can be healthy, too much self analysis can be paalyzing and counter-productive. I believe that any valid points he had to make were outweighed by his aggressive, nay combative, immature, and myopic attitude. However, (...) (24 years ago, 19-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
crap
(score: 0.185)
|
|
| |
|
crap
(score: 0.185)
|
|
| | Re: No promises when I'll be done, but...
|
| (...) *sighs, repeats self* What on earth *are* you talking about? Also... you spent 5 years working on your ship Black Hawk, no? Then why, included in it, are pieces that only came out three years ago? I can already see a *profoundly* worded (...) (24 years ago, 17-Oct-00, to lugnet.space)
| |
|
crap
(score: 0.185)
|
|
| | Re: Lego Display at Scarbourgh Center
|
| "Richard Franks" <spontificus@__no_sp...yahoo.com> wrote in message news:FH6qvw.F2G@lugnet.com... (...) "Medieval RT!!!...!!! RT is ICTS and perfect. LRT is harbourfront and is TOTAL CRAP. (HATE ALRV's) (...) points (...) *hug* Thank you for being (...) (24 years ago, 11-Oct-00, to lugnet.loc.ca.on.tor)
| |
|
crap
(score: 0.184)
|
|
| | Re: level of interest in 7151 / Sith ?
|
| (...) believe (...) It's interesting that what everyone is describing here is basically a "stock market". The bit with a buyer stating the qty and price they are willing to pay is the same as issuing a "Limit Buy Order" on the stock market. The (...) (24 years ago, 7-Oct-00, to lugnet.market.theory)
| |
|
crap
(score: 0.184)
|
|
| | Question on the value of Monorail Parts and 6347
|
| Recently, in a Bigs Lots, I found two beat-up 6347s. The boxes were deplorable and open, but the bags were sealed. Despite the condition, I bought them at the $14 asking price. Considering the nearly ~$50 price (setZilla) for one 6347, I was quite (...) (24 years ago, 3-Oct-00, to lugnet.market.appraisal)
| |
|
crap
(score: 0.184)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
