|
| |
|  
clear
(score: 1.167)
|
|
 | | Re: I2C device for the RCX
|
| Hum. i think my first post was not very clear( and whit some stupid mistakes) I think you now how I2C works: there are to lines, SCL and SDA. so whit this device, I got to sensor ports, one for SCL and one for SDA. making high and low signals on the (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.167)
|
|
| | Re: Dimensions needed for part 4424
|
| (...) Things are only a little backlogged on the PT. :\ Just to be clear -- when I posted my earlier message, I wasn't questioning the accuracy of the part. But I wasn't comfortable putting a dimension on the title based on fiddling around with the (...) (22 years ago, 10-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.167)
|
|
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.167)
|
|
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
| (...) what the differences are, which is a good thing. How did you generate it? (I know your aversion to MS and suspect you didn't use MS Word for the generation :) ) Hopefully some automatic way so we can be sure all the differences are (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.167)
|
|
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.167)
|
|
| | Re: The Classic Castle City Standard
|
| (...) I think what's probably meant here, and might be helpfull, is a clear view of the wall interface. (The cross-section so to speak) What also might be usefull, is to include some simple information about the Phytagoras mechanism for attaching (...) (21 years ago, 24-Aug-03, to lugnet.castle)
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.167)
|
|
| | Re: rtlToronto15 January issues
|
| (...) Would this mean then that robots would need to be able to lift guidewheels to clear branching points? That's how I read what you say about "grid", that there are tee/Y/cross pipe parts and not just bends. (21 years ago, 25-Aug-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.167)
|
|
| | Re: New colors and other info (ATTN JAKE)
|
| (...) Well based on the outcry here, I think it is very clear that the old colors are very popular. (...) Out of curiosity, how would you word a poll response that you would have considered to be an appropriate choice? - Chris. (21 years ago, 21-Nov-03, to lugnet.general, FTX)
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.167)
|
|
| | early 90s Pirate collection (and a few others)
|
| Currently have the following on eBay; still trying to clear some stuff out and make space in the house. Better to notify other LEGO fans and have these things go some place they will be appreciated. Ending 12/7/03: LEGO 1729 Barnacle Bay NIB LEGO (...) (21 years ago, 7-Dec-03, to lugnet.market.auction)
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.167)
|
|
| | Re: primer/tutorial on BFC?
|
| (...) [snip] (...) I just wanted to add one more post in an attempt to clear up any confusion that may have been caused in this thread. What Andy says above is correct, and my earlier post indicating otherwise was incorrect. The two dimensional (...) (21 years ago, 4-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.167)
|
|
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.167)
|
|
| | Re: Wing 8 x 4 left or right, old vs new
|
| (...) Ahh yes that picture is *much* more clear than mine... Now the only problem is, I don't think most sellers make the distinction between the two types of wing pieces... It's not a problem in most cases, since I don't encounter very many (...) (21 years ago, 11-Feb-04, to lugnet.general)
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.167)
|
|
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.167)
|
|
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.167)
|
|
| | Re: Naming Technic Liftarms
|
| (...) I'm not sure that rounded is needed. Brick vs. Beam is very clear. Besides for bricks the count is the number of studs (always even except for 1). For Beams it is the number of holes (typically an odd number, except in the case of 1x2.) Kevin (...) (21 years ago, 28-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary)
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.167)
|
|
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.167)
|
|
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.167)
|
|
| | Re: wish's - Contest canceled
|
| (...) Respectfull communication. Which has not been happening here. I think Todd has been pretty clear for quite some time what the policy on language is. Sure, it isn't spelled out (and the admin team has recognized that the TOU DO need updating), (...) (20 years ago, 3-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.167)
|
|
| | Re: On sale or not n sale
|
| (...) Hi Jake, It seems that I am not able to express myself clear enough in english, sorry about that. I will try once again: The problem is that the price on the set K10022 was always 1784 DKK, and therefore it in my opinion not an sale, but as (...) (20 years ago, 15-Apr-05, to lugnet.lego)
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.167)
|
