|
 | | Re: Quickie water elemental
|
| Hi Shiri, Looks Good! So, where can one get that cool trans-blue staff in a production set???? Brad Shiri Dori <shirid@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:Fw4061.D7M@lugnet.com... (...) the (...) hands!! (...) experimenal (...) (24 years ago, 14-Jun-00, to lugnet.castle)
| |
|  
brad
(score: 0.207)
|
|
| | Re: So where is Brad's answer to the 2001 info?
|
| (...) To anyone who might be jumping in and hearing about this for the first time, the following articles from last week explain that LEGO made a formal legal request: (3 URLs) don't read too much into the light wording Brad used above (such as (...) (24 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
brad
(score: 0.207)
|
|
| | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) That's a question for Brad or LEGO Legal via Brad. I am not a lawyer, so I can't give you legal advice on how not to break the law or how to avoid infringing on the LEGO company's rights. The policy is: Don't infringe on anyone's privacy or (...) (24 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.terms)
| |
|
brad
(score: 0.207)
|
|
| | So where is Brad's answer to the 2001 info?
|
| So here it is, AGES later (in Internet time), and not one peep out of Brad. On something so important they tapped Todd on the shoulder and requested a removal. Brad, what happened to the idea of COMMUNICATION??? You're slacking BADLY on one of your (...) (24 years ago, 18-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct) !!
| |
|
brad
(score: 0.207)
|
|
| | Re: bulk ordering is here!
|
| This is great news! I have already contributed yet more money into the LEGO coffers thanks to this service. It ends up being a great deal for adult builders since we can now build large structures much more cheaply! Anyhow, I was curious as to why (...) (24 years ago, 14-Jun-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
brad
(score: 0.207)
|
|
| |
|
brad
(score: 0.207)
|
|
| |
|
brad
(score: 0.207)
|
|
| | Re: 2001 Catalogue!!!
|
| YES! That AT-AT is a goldmine for BURPS! Where can I get one? Greg Majewski <citrusx__@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:Fw4BqB.3pz@lugnet.com... (...) Flash (...) but I (...) be (...) appear (...) (24 years ago, 14-Jun-00, to lugnet.general)
| |
|
brad
(score: 0.207)
|
|
| | Re: Dear Lego........
|
| (...) I would second this. Normally I don't just post "me too" posts, but I think that in this case, the more people Brad (and Lego Direct) hear from that feel this way, the better he'll (they'll) understand it. (...) Also disappointing, although (...) (24 years ago, 18-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| |
|
brad
(score: 0.207)
|
|
| |
|
brad
(score: 0.207)
|
|
| | Formal Letter to TLC?
|
| Hey everybody... I've noticed a lot of frustration recently by Lugnuts about TLC's lack of an explanation for 2001 set actions, neglect to do anything about copyrighted stolen images, and lack of communication in general to the community. From the (...) (24 years ago, 19-Aug-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego) !!
| |
|
brad
(score: 0.207)
|
|
| | Re: New Main LUGNET page is missing...
|
| (...) It didn't "make the cut" onto the list of Newsgroup Shortcuts on the homepage, in the interests of not encouraging noise in that area. (2 URLs) ought to be added though, IMHO, if we put in some warnings into the posting mechanisms asking (...) (24 years ago, 18-Aug-00, to lugnet.general)
| |
|
brad
(score: 0.207)
|
|
| |
|
brad
(score: 0.207)
|
|
| |
|
brad
(score: 0.207)
|
|
| |
|
brad
(score: 0.207)
|
|
| |
|
brad
(score: 0.207)
|
|
| |
|
brad
(score: 0.207)
|
|
| | Re: Clarrification needed
|
| (...) It's really for however Brad and the community (working together) thinks it best suits the both together. Personally, I would take a debate analzying LD's actions elsewhere and come back and summarize concisely after it concluded, so as not to (...) (24 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
brad
(score: 0.207)
|
|
| |
|
brad
(score: 0.207)
|
|
| |
|
brad
(score: 0.207)
|
