|
 | | Defining LED Colors in LDConfig?
|
| I've been thinking about that talk of limiting the colour definitions in LDConfig.ldr to part colours with a few expectations, and I agree with that. But I wish to throw in an idea that I don't even believe in myself but yet want to air. Is it (...) (15 years ago, 10-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|  
all
(score: 0.519)
|
|
| | Re: "Dither" colors in patterned/sticker parts
|
| As has been mentioned already in this thread, there is an ongoing effort to add support for texture maps to the LDraw format via meta commands. What hasn't been mentioned is that the current LSC is basically in favor of ratifying support for (...) (15 years ago, 10-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.519)
|
|
| | Re: *** MLCad V3.30 ***
|
| Hello Don, (...) I thought the LDraw group doesn't allow any other colors than the standard ones? Even so I was in the assumption that I didn't create any special colors, but I toulk them over from some old spec where these colors where mentioned. I (...) (15 years ago, 10-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.519)
|
|
| | Re: "Dither" colors in patterned/sticker parts
|
| (...) Michael (and anyone else), if you've got a Facebook account, you can see quite a few examples of the texture mapping work that I created while working out the syntax and getting working viewers going. Just send me a facebook invite ("Joshua (...) (15 years ago, 10-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.519)
|
|
| | Re: Using MPD syntax in official part files
|
| (...) Yeah, I checked it out the first time it was mentioned. I even poked around in the LDView CVS archives for a few minutes looking for hints of the magic syntax before the Walled Garden stuff got posted. Looks very promising! I guess I'm finally (...) (15 years ago, 11-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.519)
|
|
| | Re: Using MPD syntax in official part files
|
| (...) This is the first time I've heard this mentioned. Can someone tell me why this would be useful? I'm certainly open to the possibility, but only if it provides a concrete benefit, and I'm not having any luck coming up with what that benefit (...) (15 years ago, 10-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.519)
|
|
| | Re: Using MPD syntax in official part files
|
| (...) I was about to write the same thing, but you beat me. I think it's a great idea! I can think of two potential problems: 1. Programs that create seams between parts but not models. (Are there any more than L3P?) Depending on how they are (...) (15 years ago, 10-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.519)
|
|
| | Re: *** MLCad V3.30 ***
|
| (...) As it happens, the LSC has been dealing with this very issue for the past few months. There is no mention made of dither colors in any of the current LDraw specs (including the official parts restrictions). They somehow got dropped (...) (15 years ago, 10-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.519)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.519)
|
|
| | Re: "Dither" colors in patterned/sticker parts
|
| (...) For what it counts, I'd go for: * Explicitly disallow "dither" colors in all official parts, but allow RGB colors (of the form 0x2RRGGBB) in their place in patterned/sticker parts. This solution would give me the most freedom. I could just (...) (15 years ago, 6-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.519)
|
|
| | Re: People are idiots...
|
| (...) I don't think so - conscience could unnecessarily inhibit the free interaction of supply and demand. (...) Which rights would they be? How does 'Doing what's right' apply to true capitalism? What *is* right? Richie (22 years ago, 7-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights
(score: 0.519)
|
|
| | Water-bags fight back
|
| With pictures in the press of some rather threatening craft ((URL) and reports that intelligent Fleebnorks are preparing for war on Earth, Humanity seeks a hero. That hero has emerged in the form of one Nobby Tucker, a former pest control expert (...) (22 years ago, 19-Jan-03, to lugnet.space, lugnet.loc.au)
| |
|
property
(score: 0.519)
|
|
| | "Dither" colors in patterned/sticker parts
|
| Please read and respond to this message if you are a parts author, particularly if you have authored any patterned or sticker parts. The LSC is trying to come up with rules for colors for both LDConfig.ldr and official parts. We are having an (...) (15 years ago, 6-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.519)
|
|
| |
|
all
(score: 0.519)
|
|
| | Re: Will LEGO® launch a Battle Over name dispute (NXT) ?
|
| (...) Given LEGO probably has competent lawyers it should be a pretty quick case: Judge: Please proceed. LEGO Lawyer: Thank you your honour. Here is our trademark registration and our documented use of the trademark. WWE Lawyer: Ummmmmmm, your (...) (15 years ago, 9-Feb-10, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.519)
|
|
| |
|
all, property
(score: 0.519)
|
|
| |
|
all
(score: 0.519)
|
|
| | Re: Where no Minifig has gone before
|
| (...) Yes- these are great. I'm not familiar with the ones in the first picture (never watched Enterprise...) but the others all look familiar and are well done. -- Tony Hafner www.hafhead.com (15 years ago, 6-Feb-10, to lugnet.space)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.519)
|
|
| | Re: *** MLCad V3.30 ***
|
| (...) That's something that has been around in the last version too. (...) I have another bug... in some cases I cannot manipulate the rotation matrix because the angle value in the vector field (which I never saw much use of anyhow) is something (...) (15 years ago, 8-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.519)
|
|
| | Re: smokers
|
| (...) Seems pretty clear cut to me. When you enter a marketplace you give up certain privacy rights relating to information that has a clear impact on the market. For example, people may comment on the quality of your merchandise, your timelyness, (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jun-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.519)
|
