LUGNET News : Search Results: all rights are property rights


Search Results: all rights are property rights

Results 1101 – 1120 of about 136000.

Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: Mecha Legs
(...) Indeed. Thanks for the reminder. (...) No, I wouldn't make that claim at all. It has happened already, in fact. I may not like it but so what? I said as much in a post to off-topic.debate (this slugfest is wriggling around to a lot of (...) (24 years ago, 20-Jul-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.481)

		harry Potter & lego
Okay. you've probably already seen this... but I just noticed it. Lego have the rights to "Harry Potter Construction Toys". What do people think about all of this?? cheers sue ann (24 years ago, 23-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.au)

all, rights
(score: 2.481)

		Re: Why is cockfighting bad? (was: Pokemon (was: Harry Potter Lego Line))
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Frank Filz writes: (snipping all the things previous that I agree with - excellent analysis) (...) Indentured servitude did not give over the right to life, but it was form of slavery, so I would disagree with this (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.480)

		Re: Why is cockfighting bad? (was: Pokemon (was: Harry Potter Lego Line))
Rearranged the order a bit. Chris said: (...) Zero-th order answer: None. To that approximation, we're in agreement. Chicken fighting is something I'd never indulge in, never bet on, and never view. Further, I'd rather my kids didn't play games that (...) (24 years ago, 18-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.480)

		Re: Why is cockfighting bad? (was: Pokemon (was: Harry Potter Lego Line))
(...) TIME WARP WARNING: My replies do not always follow a chronological sequence. Explanations to such lurk somewhere in the middle. (...) This (...) Aha! What we need is a Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy beast that kills it self (humanely). :-) (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.480)

		Re: Why is cockfighting bad? (was: Pokemon (was: Harry Potter Lego Line))
(...) (snipping freely if I don't have a point to make) (...) Why is it clearly not needed? Because we are now clever enough to balance our diets properly such that we can get all the nurtients we need without resorting to meat? Is that true over (...) (24 years ago, 20-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.480)

		Re: Why is cockfighting bad? (was: Pokemon (was: Harry Potter Lego Line))
(...) our (...) So it is only now that it is immoral, and not in previous generations? Or was it a necessary immorality all along? Hmmmmm (I'm pondering this, by the way - the questions are just questions). (...) What if their culture chooses to (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.480)

		Re: Why is cockfighting bad? (was: Pokemon (was: Harry Potter Lego Line))
(...) I agree with this bit, but I'll get to sentience a bit further down. (...) Never? You allude further down to being close (at least) to buying in to the idea that you're rationallizing somewhere. Mightn't you change your mind? If not, why not? (...) (24 years ago, 20-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.480)

		Re: Picture piracy on lego.com
well youll probably be shocked but let me thank you. It was just a thought to throw into the arena. Please realize that my technical knowledge exists in the realm of litle to none in technical formatting matters. There is no easy solution to this if (...) (24 years ago, 5-Sep-00, to lugnet.publish)

all, property
(score: 2.480)

		Re: 2001 Set info
(...) Gotta disagree with that one. If it were companies (or individuals, for that matter) who got to decide what their own rights were, we'd all be in trouble. What if they said that "All four-digit numbers are trade secrets. Don't use them."? Of (...) (24 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.terms)

all, rights
(score: 2.479)

		Re: Why is cockfighting bad? (was: Pokemon (was: Harry Potter Lego Line))
(...) was (...) - (...) Fair enough. Hmmmm, situational ethics, though. Them's the breaks, I guess. (...) As long as they understand the situation...okay, I might not agree with what you define as evil, but its a reasonable process. (...) Yes, that (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.479)

		Re: Flesh eaters stole my brain (was Re: Why is cockfighting bad?
(...) What friends? ;-) (...) anything (...) I don't mind if you eat meat from vats. As I said, I might even do so a bit to try it out. I find myself very rarely wanting sausage or bacon. (...) Yup. (...) Let the technology and the market worry (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.479)

		Flesh eaters stole my brain (was Re: Why is cockfighting bad?
This debate has been churning along (very) nicely (and quite civilly, as these go, I think the same old players are getting better at debating nicely) without too much input from me since I ducked and ran (:-) but one nugget here got me to thinking. (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.479)

		Re: We are what we eat. Or is that "whom we eat?"
(...) No, that's your interpretation of it, but that's not what I said. "Rights" are an artificial construct of humans so that they can better live together. Eating is a one of our most basic needs, not a right. (...) I explained why I feel they are (...) (24 years ago, 28-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.478)

		RE: Newton Labs Not releasing PCODE source for 3.1
Jerry- You didn't 'buy' IC 3.1. You paid for a license to use the software. I doubt that you were buying the actual source code, which probably took hundreds of hours for the programmers to write. That is their intellectual property, and it is their (...) (24 years ago, 6-Sep-00, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)

all, property
(score: 2.478)

		Brand Name Sovereignty
We've all seen the lengths to which TLC is willing to go in order to protect its intellectual property, and that's certainly understandable. What about such things as: (URL) For that matter, The Learning Channel has been aka TLC for at least six or (...) (24 years ago, 18-Sep-00, to lugnet.general)

all, property
(score: 2.477)

		Re: Responsible Hunting (was Re: We are what we eat. Or is that "whom we eat?")
I guess this was in response to me, though I'm not exactly sure how. I hate to risk trying to connect it to the topic before which was based on rights and responsibilites since that doesn't seem to be the main point. So I'll take an approach (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.477)

		Re: We are what we eat. Or is that "whom we eat?"
I'm rearranging some of the points, but not the text within the points. (...) OK, I guess I can't completely. (...) Oh...I'm not trying to convince you to stop eating meat at all. And I don't think that nukes have anything to do with whether you (or (...) (24 years ago, 31-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.477)

		Re: 2001 Set info
(...) Because, all things being equal, I think it's morally wrong to delete things, unless required to do so. It can also open you up to legal issues. (...) I believe that it's wiser and safer to require specific documentation and only to delete (...) (24 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)

all, rights
(score: 2.476)

		Re: Responsible Hunting (was Re: We are what we eat. Or is that "whom we eat?")
(...) Handled below... (...) That's assuming deer HAVE that complex of a longterm memory (as opposed to spacial memory maps of the best places to eat, and instinct for a certain breeding grounds they've never been to before). (...) Nope - that can (...) (24 years ago, 5-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.476)

More: Next Page >>