To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 6180
6179  |  6181
Subject: 
Flesh eaters stole my brain (was Re: Why is cockfighting bad?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 24 Jul 2000 02:42:30 GMT
Viewed: 
1828 times
  
This debate has been churning along (very) nicely (and quite civilly, as these
go, I think the same old players are getting better at debating nicely)
without too much input from me since I ducked and ran (:-) but one nugget here
got me to thinking. Not sure I am making any definitive statement, take it as
grist for the mill and that's all.

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:

But not all animals; how about insects?  If we could grind up a zillion
drosophila and harvest the protein, would we, by your paradigm, be morally • able
to eat it?  Somewhere else on this thread it was asserted that fruit flies
don't feel pain--if not, and since their responses (as many insects') are
autonomic, then is there any moral wrong commited in consuming them?  That
might be worth considering--the ants in an acre of topsoil outweigh the soil,
so they'd provide a nearly limitless source of nutrition to those willing to
consume them.

Cite please! More ants than everything else put together? Even earthworms?
Wow. That doesn't sound right, somehow. Amazing if true, though. (neat fact
for winning drinks from your friends if referenceable!!! not that I'd ever
take drinks from my friends, oh no, not me)

In addition, if we breed animals with no brains or pain receptors, are we
then free to slay them for food, since they won't feel pain or know anything
about their environments?

Yes.  Absolutely.

Whoa!  I didn't expect you to say that.  I'll have to think about
where to go from there...

Here's one place... I agree with Chris that I'd rather not have to be in the
biz of raising animals to eat them. He'd rather we didn't eat meat, I'd rather
we got our meat from vats (the tissue cultures are, in a sense, animals with
no brains).

Stangl got it right, shrewd farmers have nothing to fear from vats... and the
non shrewd ones ought to have the props knocked out from under them... a high
rate of bankruptcies in farm country, while personally painful for the
bankruptees, is a good thing at the macro level, as I see it... We need to fix
70 years or more of distortions

How do we get from here to there correctly?

Leaving aside the morality of the genetic manipulation aspects of things, to
me there is a bit of a question I haven't satisfactorily analysed about
animals contributing stuff. If it's not OK to eat them (to me an open
question, at best, remember, I say it is) is it OK to slice them up and get
stuff out of them? That is, where is this nice KC marbled steak tissue that we
grow in our vat to come from in the first place? Some cow is going to have to
go under the knife to give up a sample. Or under the needle to lose an embyro
to be transmogrified into the tissue through developmental and growth stage
(see, there's my cousin and her fruit flies again) manipulation.

I'm thoroughly OK with that. (Animals don't have rights the way we do) But is
Chris?

And where is Dave going to get his new kidney? Pigs? Some convict? If it's not
his own tissue, do we need a waiver on file from the donor? Again, to me, no
problem, organs are sellable as are tissue samples, but clear title must be
established to avoid problems. Something that includes a test of "sound mind"
will be good. (Once we move away from our current government monopoly on organ
sale (and a "donation" is a sale, the seller just isn't the donor) and get the
organ market opened a bit wider so the free market can reduce the waiting lits
for organs, I can forsee a new market for something like title insurance to
help organ recepients clear their conscience and avoid lawsuits)

Another tangential point...

I guess I'd be mentally OK with ritualistic consumption of human flesh, if the
flesh was given up voluntarily by the human in question because the human
WANTED me to eat it (c.f. _Stranger in a Strange Land_, where Michael
Valentine Smith relates how the Martians all eat their dead to honor them...).

But I'd have a hard time choking it down. Heck I had a hard time choking down
a shrimp at an IBM awards lunch (back when I was a lot younger) which I was
eating because I wanted to show respect. (long story). My brain has a
particularly poor control connection to my gorge reflex, almost anything can
make me a bit nauseated. *There's* something I'd rather have edited out of my
genes, but too late, my kids got it already.

++Lar



Message has 3 Replies:
  Re: Flesh eaters stole my brain (was Re: Why is cockfighting bad?
 
(...) C'mon Lar--don't cloud the issue with a call for facts! Actually, I'll have to recheck my info. Maybe it *was* earthworms, and they're not half as crunchy as insects. To digress re: Ant Weight, here are a few tidbits I came across: from (URL) (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: Flesh eaters stole my brain (was Re: Why is cockfighting bad?
 
(...) What friends? ;-) (...) anything (...) I don't mind if you eat meat from vats. As I said, I might even do so a bit to try it out. I find myself very rarely wanting sausage or bacon. (...) Yup. (...) Let the technology and the market worry (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: Flesh eaters stole my brain (was Re: Why is cockfighting bad?
 
(...) Here's an odd twist to think about: most (all?) domesticated animals, especially farm animals, are sufficiently different from their wild bretheren that they can be considered separate species. Also, if we can raise meat in a vat, we can (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Why is cockfighting bad? (was: Pokemon (was: Harry Potter Lego Line))
 
(...) I admit that I was a little more sharp-tongued than the situation justified, and if so I certainly apologize. I was reacting to "Bzzzt. Wrong answer" more than anything else, which has always struck me as an attempt to belittle the opposing (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

149 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR