|
| |
|  
firmware
(score: 0.750)
|
|
 | | Re: The Future of Trains
|
| (...) Stalled, the train motor pulls 950 mA, while the stall current of the NXT motor is a whopping 2 Amps. So a single NXT motor output should easily handle a twin-engine train loaded to the point where it stalls the engine(s)... there's the matter (...) (17 years ago, 7-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.robotics.nxt)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 0.750)
|
|
| | NXT-G/ROBOTC Firmware Scheduler and Clump Priority
|
| In a typical operating system (OS), tasks are scheduled on a priority basis. The highest priority task always executes ahead of lower priority tasks. If there are multiple tasks at the highest priority, then they are typically executed in a round (...) (17 years ago, 6-Sep-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 0.747)
|
|
| |
|
firmware
(score: 0.747)
|
|
| | Re: Service pack 5111 - Wires - no longer available
|
| (...) at (...) matter (...) Huh? Say I only use AA batteries (1.5V) How will I use the same number of batteries for a 4.5V, a 9V, and a 12V system? You need more batteries to get the higher voltage (or a step-up transformer to raise the voltage, but (...) (22 years ago, 2-Sep-02, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
mindstorms, firmware
(score: 0.747)
|
|
| |
|
firmware
(score: 0.746)
|
|
| |
|
firmware
(score: 0.746)
|
|
| |
|
firmware
(score: 0.746)
|
|
| |
|
firmware
(score: 0.745)
|
|
| |
|
firmware
(score: 0.745)
|
|
| | RE: Ooops! NXT Software Comparison correction
|
| (...) After tuning, NBC achieved 73K test cycles. It achieved these great results by setting the task "priority" to 200. Unfortunately, unless the NXT-G task scheduler has been rewritten, these results might be a little too high. A NXT-G task (or (...) (17 years ago, 6-Sep-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 0.745)
|
|
| |
|
firmware
(score: 0.744)
|
|
| | Re: Ooops! NXT Software Comparison correction
|
| (...) Nearly all of the speed test numbers on Steve's page are wrong. That's because Steve's loop boils down to "how fast can you reliably read the LEGO Ultrasonic Sensor". You can't reliably read a value from that device faster than about once (...) (17 years ago, 2-Sep-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 0.744)
|
|
| |
|
firmware
(score: 0.744)
|
|
| |
|
firmware
(score: 0.744)
|
|
| |
|
firmware
(score: 0.744)
|
|
| | Re: Newbie Q's about development environments
|
| (...) NXC provides all the features available to you in NXT-G, including all the items you mention, plus many that you cannot access in that programming language. It is freely available and it targets the standard NXT firmware. John Hansen (17 years ago, 23-Aug-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 0.742)
|
|
| | RE: Newbie Q's about development environments
|
| If you go to Steve Hassenplug's site ((URL) you'll find a comparison of the various text based programming environments including NXC, ROBOTC, LUA, and JAVA. These solutions are all virtual machine based. ROBOTC has the fastest execution speed of (...) (17 years ago, 23-Aug-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 0.742)
|
|
| | Re: stop task
|
| (...) It is not a rather awkward option, imho. That's like saying breaking out of an infinite loop using a flag is awkward and that it would be better to have some form of stop loop keyword that you could use from outside the loop instead. Is it (...) (17 years ago, 24-Jul-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 0.741)
|
|
| | Real C/C++ Programming Solution?
|
| Is there a programming solution for the NXT that will allow me to use real C/C++? I've been trying to use NXTGCC (this is for firmware development based on an existing firmware for another controller, which is written in C/C++), but the code seems (...) (17 years ago, 7-Aug-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt.nxthacking)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 0.741)
|
