 | | Re: Subgroups? (was: Re: Hey!)
|
|
If we end up going to sub-groups, I think I would rather see them split by function rather than by TLC's somewhat illogical theme grouping. I can see a point of having a separate group for discussing Arctic from the rest of town because not many (...) (25 years ago, 31-Dec-99, to lugnet.space, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: What would a lego stormtrooper be?
|
|
(...) Very delicate printing, please! Just a hint of joints, etc. (25 years ago, 31-Dec-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Remy's Big Lego Christmas! (was Re: Big Lego Christmas)
|
|
Larry Pieniazek wrote in message <386CBF20.F4D0D6D0@v...er.net>... (...) Mundanes! Yes! That's it exactly! AFOLs on the one hand, mundanes on the other. Suddenly everything makes sense. But it wouldn't do to discuss it in those terms with THEM. (...) (25 years ago, 31-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Building a Mini-fig Army, how much to pay
|
|
(...) I figure you could sell the horse and the wall section for more than $1 total. And of course if you wan tand snag this set on sales (or even clearances) you'll be even better off. (...) I'll go with that, although I generally price 'current' (...) (25 years ago, 31-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Building a Mini-fig Army, how much to pay
|
|
Dan Siskind has a number of castle dudes that he has accumulated, he may or may not be willing to sell some off. I have a picture of ranks and ranks of them, which, someday, if I ever find my driver disk for the scanner, or get the energy to track (...) (25 years ago, 31-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: 4811 Defense Archer!
|
|
Oops, I was confused as to which system showed the old catalog, and now it is showing the new catalog. The machine which was showing the old catalog is one of our central servers, still an RS/6000 though. At this point, I would have to say that it (...) (25 years ago, 31-Dec-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Happy 2000
|
|
(...) And remember, everyone, take an ample supply of bricks to your bunker with you! The basic Lego brick has been Y2K compliant since 1949 or so! Here's a laugh for you, a media type was proudly displaying an ATM receipt he got, dated 1/1/00 (...) (25 years ago, 31-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 4811 Defense Archer!
|
|
(...) I think that last is perhaps a little unlikely. I'm not sure exactly what the infrastructure of our network here at IBM is, but I strongly doubt there is anything Microsoft between my RS/6000 and www.lego.com. I just did a little bit of (...) (25 years ago, 31-Dec-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Remy's Big Lego Christmas! (was Re: Big Lego Christmas)
|
|
Well, (...) You and I know that but the mundanes don't. If you get an instance of a particular set, you have to expect that your mundane relatives won't buy the "but I want MORE copies" argument and refuse to buy it for you. (...) The dark side (...) (25 years ago, 31-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Port Block sees in the new nineteenth century
|
|
Despite all the predictions of doom and destruction, midnight has come and gone. The candles and torches did not go out, the lock on my treasure chest still fails to work (just like it always did), my abacus still does work, blood did not rain from (...) (25 years ago, 31-Dec-99, to lugnet.pirates)
|
