 | | Re: Amount spent - LEGO code update (Re: Brad Justus' Comments - Why Complain?_
|
|
(...) Yes. Must have been a transmission error since I never make misteaks. (25 years ago, 27-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | RE: Pascal as language for programming a RCX-module
|
|
(...) See (URL) for a MazeWalker done in pbForth.... Cheers, Ralph Hempel - P.Eng ---...--- Check out pbFORTH for LEGO Mindstorms at: (URL) ---...--- Reply to: rhempel at bmts dot com ---...--- (25 years ago, 27-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: New Castle Sucks (so far...)
|
|
Richard, please learn how to cross post, if you would. You've started this thread, or a very similar one, in more than one group. It's far better to post one post to several groups. Thanks. Cross posting is easy no matter whether you are using the (...) (25 years ago, 27-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Pasenger cars
|
|
Hi, I posted some pictures of my new passenger cars on my home page. Two (equal ones) are in white/red/blue (idee from our Belgian railroad) and one in green (old style passenger car) witch uses the small clear blue windows from the 4560/4561 set. (...) (25 years ago, 27-Dec-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Amount spent - LEGO code update (Re: Brad Justus' Comments - Why Complain?_
|
|
(...) Agreed. (...) NOT agreed. If we don't complain, they won't know that they "have a problem". As I've stated before, I will respect TLC's wishes, but I certainly WON'T agree with them. Posting info to their website, linked or not, means it's (...) (25 years ago, 27-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | FA (eBay) Silver Tub, Technic, Non-US Adventurers
|
|
Ends Tonight: 223992730: Lego Technic 8735 Power Pack Motor Set 1 Bid at: $25.00 Auction ends on: Dec-27-99, 20:24:41 PST (URL) Lego Adventurers 5905/5906 (Achu) Non-US Sets 1 Bid at: $10.00 Auction ends on: Dec-27-99, 20:31:12 PST (URL) Lego (...) (25 years ago, 27-Dec-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| |
| | Re: Amount spent - LEGO code update (Re: Brad Justus' Comments - Why Complain?_
|
|
(...) c/Carrey/Carney since I'm assuming you mean the guy with the fantastic! castles... :) James (URL) (25 years ago, 27-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Hiawatha
|
|
(...) Better than most of your work and almost all the way up to Mediocre? (1) 1 - that's not one word but hey, neither is "looking like..." (25 years ago, 27-Dec-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Amount spent - LEGO code update (Re: Brad Justus' Comments - Why Complain?_
|
|
Snippets: (...) You seem to have me confused with the person who originally challenged you, Wayne, as I had no argument with you. (...) Sorry - I guess I didn't make my point clear - I wanted to lampoon the idea that was used to attack you - that we (...) (25 years ago, 27-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: January 2000 S@H catalog
|
|
(...) Chicks in Chainmail, Boris Vallejo, and all that? :-) (25 years ago, 27-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Amount spent - LEGO code update (Re: Brad Justus' Comments - Why Complain?_
|
|
(...) I think your opinion is serious and I think Mark may have come off a bit harsh and knee jerkish. Further, as someone who is in the top decile, if not in the top 1%, of AFOLs, when ranked by amount spent, I think that the amount you spend is (...) (25 years ago, 27-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Brick.tube evolution?
|
|
(...) The Ultimate LEGO Book (DK Publishing, 1999) contains a "timeline" of the evolution of the LEGO brick. The first plastic LEGO bricks, introduced in 1949, although resembling modern bricks with the studs on top, had slots on the sides of the (...) (25 years ago, 27-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New Castle Sucks (so far...)
|
|
(...) I have all three of those as well, and I'll agree, they could be more, but I like them. My only problem with 6095 is that it's at the wrong price point. (2 less pieces=10 more bucks?!?!?) (...) You seem to be assuming that this piece will (...) (25 years ago, 27-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Amount spent - LEGO code update (Re: Brad Justus' Comments - Why Complain?_
|
|
(...) I chose to use Wayne's response as a launching point for my reply because, while defending himself against an attack, he wound up inadvertantly validating the concept of the attack, which was (paraphrased) "go away and come back when you've (...) (25 years ago, 27-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Bulk Pieces suggestions
|
|
Another hypothetical implementation of bulk sales could have online databases showing the factory production schedules of what pieces, with deadlines for ordering so you could get pieces quickly. Also, an ordering database could allow group members (...) (25 years ago, 27-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: The Invasion of Strombrachter Page
|
|
My previous note about the text and picture arrangement only applies to the big pictures (i.e. the first one) ... the rest is quite easy to read. Again, very neat! -- Paul Davidson Pawel Nazarewicz <verneer@utk.edu> wrote in message (...) (25 years ago, 27-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: The Invasion of Strombrachter Page
|
|
I'm just getting into this, it looks really neat! (a lot like something I want to do in the future) Format-wise, maybe the text should be beside the picture instead of underneath. I can't read it and look at the picture at the same time, which is a (...) (25 years ago, 27-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: New Castle Sucks (so far...)
|
|
Sounds like they're trying discourage kids from making their own creations by making new pieces as useless and incompatible with previous Lego as possible. -- Paul Davidson Richard Marchetti <BlueOfNoon@aol.com> wrote in message (...) (25 years ago, 27-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: 8448 (era Re: tuttitubi????)
|
|
Mario Ferrari <mario.ferrari@edis.it> wrote in message FnEoDI.EDn@lugnet.com... (...) di (...) a (...) :-) (...) Così positivo da sostituire la 8880 nei tuoi kit preferiti?? -- LEg GOdt :-) Domenico (25 years ago, 27-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.it)
|
| |
| | Re: Pascal as language for programming a RCX-module
|
|
If you use Pascal for Windows (Delphi) you can use the spirit.ocx driver that comes with the CD. If you use Pascal for DOS you'll have to do your own interfacing, which isn't very difficult. Just take a look at the pages 'dos' and 'cracking' in the (...) (25 years ago, 27-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
