 | | Re: Exploration Mars Available?
|
|
I've done some editing (zooming and brightening) on the Lego-supplied photo. Results/speculation are at (URL) Wilcox WordSmith Digital Document Services 403 VFW Drive Rockland, MA 02370 781-871-6162 fax 781-871-6264 (URL) 24868783 - Web design (...) (25 years ago, 6-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: You are not authorized to view this page
|
|
big system failure has occurred. following is msg from our sys admins. fred as i'm sure you all have noticed, our most critial file server hub.media.mit.edu is having major problems. we are looking into it but do not currently have an estimate of (...) (25 years ago, 9-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
| |
| | NQC 2.1 in beta test (Scout support, fast firmware)
|
|
NQC 2.1 b1 is available at (URL) two "big" features are fast firmware downloading (4x speed) and preliminary support for the Scout. Emphasis on "preliminary". It is enough to do some basic NQC stuff on the Scout, but most of the nifty Scout features (...) (25 years ago, 9-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics.scout)
|
| |
| | Re: Exploration Mars Availalble?
|
|
I've done some editing (zooming and brightening) on the Lego-supplied photo. Results/speculation are at (URL) Wilcox WordSmith Digital Document Services 403 VFW Drive Rockland, MA 02370 781-871-6162 fax 781-871-6264 (URL) 24868783 - Web design (...) (25 years ago, 6-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | rotation sensors in legOS 0.2.2
|
|
Has anyone out there successfully had a rotation sensor running in legOS 0.2.2 I have had a quick look through the last few posts I could find on lugnet and we have recompiled legOS to include the updated dsensor.c and dsensor.h code found on the (...) (25 years ago, 9-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: LegAuz
|
|
(...) Quick!! Let's build a big LEGO wall around Australia to keep him out!! Stop him from posting to our group. Nasty, eavesdropping, opinionated meanie!!! ;-) Welcome to "Australia", Todd (...) Todd does raise an interesting point. We should chose (...) (25 years ago, 9-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.au.nsw.syd)
|
| |
| | Re: 4561 sale at kbkids
|
|
Well, after just ordering one from KB last night, I ordered one from Toysmart after seeing this post. Mine totalled to $72.79 - there was no shipping, no tax, and 30% off the $103.98 sale price. CRUD, I KNEW this was going to happen - I promised (...) (25 years ago, 9-Dec-99, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.market.shopping)
|
| |
| | Has anyone even SEEN bucket 4285? Tub 4291? In the US?
|
|
The Lego website has shown a smaller BASIC bucket, 4285, for months and months. They put it on the site at the same time that they put info about the 4288 up. 4288 is available everywhere I look, but I have YET to find 4285. Has anyone seen one yet? (...) (25 years ago, 9-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Technic Space Shuttle on sale at Zany Brainy
|
|
Hi all. I was just going through my Sunday L.A. Times, and found a flyer from Zany Brainy. They're selling the Space Shuttle kit for $74.99. (And all you guys better stay away from the store down the street from me until I get mine! :-) d. (25 years ago, 5-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Pastel = Profit (Was Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?)
|
|
Well, the other side of the coin is that YOU, and ONLY you, knew the full details of what they did/did not say was OK. All we have to go on is the Fair Use Policy posted on lego.com. We (the unwashed <g>) won't know any better unless the Policy is (...) (25 years ago, 9-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Received my RIS 1.5 Upgrade Kit
|
|
(...) Is this a free upgrade only if you bought your RIS set recently? Or is it this price to everyone in Canada? <ICS> (25 years ago, 7-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | just checking... did the server die?
|
|
haven't received anything from the lego listserv group in a few days and I just am checking... did the server crash? cc to Dave Baum : 'cause he is Mr. Legos Robotics :) (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Exploration Mars Availalble?
|
|
(...) Well, from the press release below, it seems like they're talking about a digital (mid-res?) *photo* cam, not a video cam. (...) ___...___ Marco C. aka McViper (25 years ago, 6-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Pastel = Profit (Was Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?)
|
|
(...) Whoops, darn it, I did it again. I meant this message, (URL) #2743. Sorry. --Todd (25 years ago, 9-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Pastel = Profit (Was Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?)
|
|
(...) (Just re-reading what I just wrote) Bad wording -- I didn't mean that to sound like a back-handed slap. And I don't mean to demean educated guesses. I just meant that maybe the tone of this message, (URL) a bit strong, given the known facts. (...) (25 years ago, 9-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Pastel = Profit (Was Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?)
|
|
(...) Inasmuch as I dislike "tooting the horn," I also try not to keep important things like that secret, assuming I am able to say one way or the other. In October of 1997, for example, I did mention that Suzanne and I had had a meeting with two (...) (25 years ago, 9-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Pastel = Profit (Was Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?)
|
|
(...) As much as this thread has stirred up some strong feelings (no real anger on my part - hope there isn't on most other peoples') this made me laugh and laugh and laugh. Pssst, hurry up... while they're still quiet. Bring up the cans and the (...) (25 years ago, 9-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Pastel = Profit (Was Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?)
|
|
(...) Right, not much. And as much as I trust Todd, and I do, I don't accept his opinion as gospel truth about all things related to how TLC/G feels about all issues. Certainly not based on the few haizy references I've seen to "private" (...) (25 years ago, 9-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGOZ 2000
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) Is that leg-o-s or le-go-o-s? I pronounce it "oss", as in Beos, or "floss". So it's Leg-oss. And LegOz has a hard zed sound, while legos is pronounced more like leg-oes. Your pronunciation may vary, as may your (...) (25 years ago, 7-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.au.nsw.syd)
|
